At a Glance

Seat

U.S. Senator from New Mexico

Born

October 17, 1971

Age 54

Phone

(202) 224-5521

Office

709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 772

Yes32%

No64%

Present0%

Not Voting4%

Party align93%

Cross-party6%

SoupScore

District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @MartinHeinrich Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Martin Heinrich

U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico

SoupScore

Martin's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 241 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJul 3(source)

Largest cut to Medicaid in American history. Largest transfer of wealth to the rich in American history. Largest cut to food assistance in American history. Just like Senate Republicans, House Republicans chose greed, cruelty, & a callous disregard for the people they represent.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJul 3(source)

If you don't support cuts to Medicaid, don't vote for it. If you don't support cuts to food assistance, don't vote for it. It really is that simple.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJul 1(source)

A big, beautiful betrayal. My statement on Republicans' cruelty:

The largest cut to Medicaid in American history. The largest transfer of wealth to the rich in American history. The largest cut to food assistance in American history. The largest increase to the national deficit in American history: That’s what this bill represents. And it has one effect — billionaires win, American families lose. It’s a betrayal of working families masquerading as legislation.

If signed into law, this bill will hike electricity bills, leave tens of millions uninsured, cut food assistance for millions more, shutter hundreds of nursing homes, force rural hospitals to close, and send health insurance premiums soaring. The consequences of this bill will be deadly — and Republicans will own every single one.

Senate Republicans had a choice: stand with working families or bend to billionaires. They chose greed, cruelty, and a callous disregard for the people they represent. New Mexicans and all Americans will suffer for it. I urge all Americans to raise their voices and call on their elected leaders in the House of Representatives to stop this disaster before it becomes law.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJul 1(source)

If this bill passes, Republicans will own increased energy prices.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 30(source)

This bill is a disaster for Americans’ health care. It will leave tens of millions uninsured, cut food assistance for millions more, force hundreds of nursing homes and rural hospitals to close, and cause health insurance premiums to skyrocket. Republicans know all of this.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 30(source)

With their Big, Beautiful Betrayal Bill, congressional Republicans are abandoning everyday Americans and bending over backwards to deliver for mega corporations and billionaire donors.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 30(source)

Republicans’ Big Beautiful Betrayal Bill could close up to 8 rural hospitals in New Mexico and more than 300 nationwide. They just voted to keep those closures in the bill anyway. All for billionaire tax handouts. Cruel and sickening.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 30(source)

FACT: -Energy demand is increasing FACT: -Republicans are eliminating the cheapest, fastest-to-build energy sources FACT: -Republicans are gutting energy efficiency standards and tax credits that save you money FACT: -Republicans' actions are increasing your utility bills

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 29(source)

Today is a major victory for our public lands. Thank YOU for your incredible outpouring in defense of our American birthright. Because of you, the lands that we cherish will remain OURS. And to those already plotting to go after our public lands another way: Don’t. Unless you like losing.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 28(source)

Senate Republicans’ bill will hurt Americans in every state.

Senate Energy Dems

@energydems.senate.gov

Open post ↗

The Republican Tax Bill is going to cost Americans: -300,000 jobs per year in the wind and solar industry -300 GW less energy on the grid -Higher electricity bills in every state in the country Families across the country are footing the bill for tax cuts for the wealthy.

Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich

Senate Energy Dems@energydems.senate.govJun 28(source)

A reminder 👇

Senate Energy Dems

@energydems.senate.gov

Open post ↗

Trump is making electricity more expensive–not less. That’s because of something we’ll call the “Trump Tax”—a combination of tariffs, canceled clean energy investments, and cuts to energy affordability programs. Now his “big, beautiful bill” could make it even worse. 🧵

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 28(source)

Call your senators and tell them HELL NO on this Big Billionaire Bailout.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 28(source)

Want to know how much more you can expect to pay on your electric bill if Republicans pass this bill? This interactive map breaks it down. t.co/7ThWgjE4hM

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 28(source)

Trump’s policies have real consequences. And Sandia’s effort to reduce its workforce plays into this Administration’s dismantling of federal agencies, undercutting national security, and devaluing science. The Trump Administration needs to stop playing politics with our Labs and economy.

Sandia National Laboratories to cut up to 3% of workforce by early fall

The workforce reduction will amount to 1-3%, meaning that it could range between 170-510 workers as the federal lab employs nearly 17,000 people.

Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich

Senate Energy Dems@energydems.senate.govJun 27(source)

“I’m seeing a shared love of public lands and a lot of willingness to push party politics aside for something this valuable."

A Conservative’s Plan to Sell Public Lands Faces MAGA Pushback

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 27(source)

From the Sierra Club to Joe Rogan, everybody is pissed off about Republicans' public lands sell off. This is the broadest coalition I've seen around public lands in my lifetime, so keep making sure your voices are heard because we're winning.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJun 26(source)

Nearly 70% of Planned Parenthood clinics are in medically underserved areas. They're vital to women's health across the country. Republicans and a radical Supreme Court shouldn't make health care decisions for the millions of women who rely on @ppfa.org for essential services.

Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich

LCV – League of Conservation Voters 🌎@lcv.orgJun 25(source)

In their Big Ugly Bill, Senate Republicans are attempting to sell-off our public lands. Thank you @heinrich.senate.gov for hosting a roundtable joined by @cortezmasto.senate.gov, Sen. Hickenlooper, @wyden.senate.gov, and voices from the West to expose this threat and fight back.

Public Lands Roundtable

YouTube video by Senate Energy Dems

Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich

LCV – League of Conservation Voters 🌎@lcv.orgJun 25(source)

“In one fell swoop, these proposals threaten every form of outdoor recreation, of natural and cultural heritage... All to pay for a tax handout. That doesn’t sound very American to me.” WATCH @heinrich.senate.gov call out Republican's attempts to sell off our public lands 👇

Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich

Senate Energy Dems@energydems.senate.govJun 21(source)

Trump’s energy agenda is a tax on working families. Let’s be clear: 🔌 Cutting clean energy 📈 Raising tariffs ❌ Defunding energy aid programs …is a recipe for higher prices, fewer jobs, and a less-secure grid.

← Newer postsPosts page 23Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(42)

S. 4458 (119th)
A bill to establish the Caja del Rio Special Management Area and Caja del Rio National Conse…
S. 4420 (119th)
A bill to amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation of physical t…
S. 4425 (119th)
A bill to prohibit the use of Federal funds to implement the Executive order entitled "Promo…
S. 4258 (119th)
A bill to authorize the Secretary of Education to award grants to revitalize schoolyards.
S. 4252 (119th)
A bill to amend the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land Withdrawal Act to ensure that economic …

Cosponsored Bills(241)

S. 4455 (119th)
A bill to amend section 313 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to designate provisions …
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. 4460 (119th)
A bill to provide for an extension of the rural community hospital demonstration program.
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. 4470 (119th)
A bill to amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to improve the Offi…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. 4434 (119th)
A bill to amend the Clayton Act to provide for the divestiture of certain transactions, and …
Joined: 2026-04-29
S. 4441 (119th)
A bill to establish the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource, and for other pu…
Joined: 2026-04-29

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

772 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2026-04-30	S.J. Res. 184 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 184	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-50)
2026-04-30	S. Res. 690 (119th)	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-04-29	S.J. Res. 99 (119th)	Begin consideration	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-04-29	S.J. Res. 139 (119th)	Begin consideration	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-52)
2026-04-29	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (59-39)
2026-04-28	S.J. Res. 124 (119th)	Point of Order S.J.Res. 124	NO	NO	✓	Point of Order Well Taken (51-47)
2026-04-28	S. Res. 690 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2026-04-27	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-37)
2026-04-23	S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)	Accept House changes	NO	NO	✓	Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-04-23	S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-49)
2026-04-23	S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-50)
2026-04-23	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Padilla Amdt. No. 4855)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5159)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23	S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-52)
2026-04-23	S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (25-73)
2026-04-23	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Markey Amdt. No. 5001)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hawley Amdt. No. 4794)	NO	NO	✓	Motion Rejected (50-48, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kennedy Amdt. No. 5414)	NO	NO	✓	Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Alsobrooks Amdt. No. 5294)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 4956)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hirono Amdt. No. 4884)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22	S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Agreed to (98-0)
2026-04-22	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Ossoff Amdt. No. 4897)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Lujan Amdt. No. 4798)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 4799)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22	S.J. Res. 114 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 114	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (46-51)
2026-04-21	S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2026-04-20	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (47-46)
2026-04-16	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-04-16	H.J. Res. 140 (119th)	Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 140	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (50-49)
2026-04-15	H.J. Res. 140 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2026-04-15	H.J. Res. 140 (119th)	Kill the motion	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Table Agreed to (51-48)
2026-04-15	S.J. Res. 138 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 138	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (36-63)
2026-04-15	S.J. Res. 32 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 32	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (40-59)
2026-04-15	S.J. Res. 123 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 123	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-52)
2026-04-14	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-04-14	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2026-04-14	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2026-04-13	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-03-26	H.R. 7147 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-26	S. 1383 (119th)	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-25	S.J. Res. 103 (119th)	Begin consideration	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50)
2026-03-25	H.R. 7147 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-25	S.J. Res. 107 (119th)	Begin consideration	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-24	S.J. Res. 116 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 116	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-24	S. 1383 (119th)	Kill the motion	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24	S. 1383 (119th)	Kill the motion	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24	—	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2026-03-24	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-47)
2026-03-23	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 16Next →