Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Voting Record — 890
Yes34%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 55 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Trump promised to lower food costs—and one of the ways we can do that is by vaccinating poultry against the bird flu. I’ve asked USDA Secretary Rollins to share her plans to lower egg and poultry prices through vaccination efforts while preserving export markets for American farmers.
Gutting the Education Department will have disastrous consequences for New Mexico. Our schools depend on federal funds to hire teachers and to provide extra support so all our kids learn and succeed. I'll do everything I can to stop this unlawful attack on our children’s future.
Halting payments Congress authorized for wildfire mitigation is unlawful and dangerous. So is a federal hiring freeze. How does the Trump administration plan to effectively fight wildfires if the forest service can’t hire firefighters? sourcenm.com/briefs/u-s-s...
We need to expand access to career-connected learning as early as high school. Providing students with job skills will ensure more New Mexicans have career opportunities they can build families around, strengthening our middle class. www.abqjournal.com/business/art...
Trump’s hiring freeze of federal firefighters puts lives, homes, and communities in danger. It is essential that federal firefighters can hire, onboard, and train their teams ahead of fire season. This administration must end this freeze immediately. www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...
The federal hiring freeze will have disastrous implications for national parks. Families don’t deserve to have their weekend trips ruined and local economies shouldn’t be destroyed over Trump’s chaos. I’m urging Secretary Burgum to take immediate action.
I’m working hard to protect federal funding for New Mexico’s schools, teachers, and kids. I want to thank the Las Cruces School Board for meeting with me and discussing ways we can prepare students for high-quality careers they can build their families around.
This Blake's breakfast burrito now costs $1 more because the price of eggs keeps skyrocketing since Trump took office. Instead of helping us find a solution, his chaos and incompetence have only made it worse.
Tulsi Gabbard’s poor judgement and lack of national security experience make her wholly unqualified to keep Americans safe as our Director of National Intelligence. I voted no on her nomination.
Time and again, Ms. Gabbard has elevated conspiracy theories, parroted dictators’ talking points, and repeatedly undermined our country’s national security. Her poor judgment and lack of national security experience make her wholly unqualified to keep Americans safe as our Director of National Intelligence. Ms. Gabbard’s responses during her nomination hearing made this clear, refusing to call Edward Snowden a traitor and, in response to my questions, falsely denying knowledge of comments by a Syrian cleric she met with in 2017 who threatened to unleash suicide bombers in the United States. 

Put plainly, Tulsi Gabbard is a national security risk. She appears to trust information from every other source but the Intelligence Community. Yet as the Director of National Intelligence, she would be entrusted with providing the most sensitive intelligence to the president and determining what intelligence to share with our allies. 

As I continue to carry out my constitutional duty, I will remain vigilant to ensure that every nominee is properly vetted and has the qualifications to serve.
We’re losing nearly 75,000 Americans each year to fentanyl overdoses. I refuse to accept this reality. Our HALT Fentanyl Act would give law enforcement the tools they need to help stop the flow of these deadly drugs into our communities and save lives. www.foxnews.com/us/overdose-...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationYESNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESNOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (54-40)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-05-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 18Next →