H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Bill Overview

Disapprove EPA California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution…

CRA DisapprovalEnvironmental Protection|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresAir quality
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 2, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageLaw

Became Public Law No: 119-16.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
CRA DisapprovalWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to overturn a recent EPA decision to grant California a waiver related to advanced vehicle pollution standards. If Congress passes the resolution and the President signs it, the EPA notice would be nullified and have no force or effect. The CRA also stops the agency from issuing a new rule that is substantially the same unless Congress enacts new law. The resolution must be approved by both chambers and signed by the President to take effect.

Rule targeted

California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision (90 Fed. Reg. 642 (January 6, 2025)).

Issuing agency

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Passage rules

Under the Congressional Review Act, Senate procedures limit debate and prevent a filibuster on disapproval resolutions, allowing passage by a simple majority in the Senate; the measure still must pass both chambers and be presented to the President for signature or veto. The CRA process must be used within a set window of time after the rule was submitted.

This joint resolution disapproves and nullifies an EPA rule granting California a waiver to implement the "Advanced Clean Cars II" motor vehicle emissions standards (90 Fed.

Reg. 642, Jan 6, 2025).

Under the Congressional Review Act framework, the resolution declares that EPA's waiver decision shall have no force or effect.

Passage40/100

Narrow and administratively simple but high political stakes and federalism concerns reduce likelihood without clear bipartisan support and executive alignment.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this joint resolution is appropriately concise and legally targeted: it identifies a single EPA rule and declares it nullified under the Congressional Review Act. It provides the essential legal citation and operative effect but contains no explanatory findings, fiscal discussion, transition provisions, or oversight provisions.

Contention72/100

Progressives emphasize climate and public-health harms from blocking California standards.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
States · ManufacturersStates · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • StatesMaintains a single national vehicle regulatory standard, reducing differing state compliance regimes for automakers.
  • ManufacturersReduces the likelihood of manufacturers facing multiple, potentially conflicting state rules and certification processe…
  • ManufacturersLowers projected regulatory compliance costs that supporters say could affect vehicle prices and manufacturer margins.
Likely burdened
  • StatesPrevents California from implementing stricter pollution and zero-emission vehicle standards tailored to state goals.
  • Potential burdenMay slow the deployment of zero-emission vehicles and associated reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Local governmentsCould worsen local air quality outcomes and associated public health benefits projected under stricter standards.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize climate and public-health harms from blocking California standards.
Progressive10%

Likely strongly opposed: views disapproval as a setback for climate, air quality, and states' ability to set stricter standards.

Sees it as blocking a key tool to accelerate electric vehicle adoption and reduce emissions.

Likely resistant
Centrist40%

Mixed but cautious: worries about regulatory costs and nationwide compliance complexity, while also concerned about climate and state authority.

Would seek a balanced federal solution instead of blocking state action outright.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Likely supportive: sees disapproval as limiting federal overreach and preventing California from effectively setting de facto national standards.

Values lowering regulatory burdens for businesses and preserving interstate regulatory uniformity.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Law

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Passage likelihood40/100

Narrow and administratively simple but high political stakes and federalism concerns reduce likelihood without clear bipartisan support and executive alignment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the President would sign or veto
  • Senate procedural dynamics and floor support
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

SENATE · May 22, 2025
Approve resolution✓ PassedParty-line

The Senate formally adopted this resolution.

What is a approve resolution?

A resolution is a formal statement or decision by the chamber. Simple resolutions apply only to one chamber; joint resolutions require both chambers.

Yes 54% No 46%
Against party line
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
HOUSE · May 1, 2025
Final passage✓ PassedParty-line

The House passed this bill. It now goes to the other chamber, and eventually to the President for signature.

What is a final passage?

The final vote on whether the bill becomes law (pending the other chamber and the President).

Yes 60% No 40%
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize climate and public-health harms from blocking California standards.

Narrow and administratively simple but high political stakes and federalism concerns reduce likelihood without clear bipartisan support and…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this joint resolution is appropriately concise and legally targeted: it identifies a single EPA rule and declares it nullified under the Congressional Review Act. It provides t…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis