Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Voting Record — 890
Yes34%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 55 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Remember the bipartisan border security bill that Republicans tanked because Trump said to? Republicans will do or say whatever Trump & his billionaire friends want them to. Even if it means your safety or your paycheck.
Today marks 10 years since we successfully transferred management of the Valles Caldera to the National Park Service, expanding public access of this breathtaking place for more New Mexicans to enjoy & investing in our outdoor recreation economy. Public lands belong in public hands.
Elon Musk & Donald Trump don’t have to worry about paying rent or buying groceries as a government shutdown looms. But millions of New Mexican families do — including federal workers & service members. They're using working families' livelihoods as a bargaining chip for their billionaire buddies.
Translation of what’s happening today in DC: The richest guy on the planet is shutting down the government and taking recovery funds away from fire victims so that he can tee up a tax cut for billionaires in 2025.
So we're clear: Elon Musk & Donald Trump want to raise the debt ceiling to afford their tax cut for billionaires. What they're saying is, if Republicans don't pave the way for their tax cut for the rich, then our troops don't get paid for Christmas. To them, working Americans are a bargaining chip.
NEWS: My legislation to reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act is headed to the President's desk! This bill will improve access to clean drinking water, bolster our outdoor rec economy, & protect wildlife & their habitats for future generations.
Right now, President-elect Trump is urging members of Congress to vote against funding for those impacted by the Hermit’s Peak/Calf Canyon Fire and the entire end of year funding legislation.
I am honored to serve as Ranking Member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. My work will be grounded in my love of public lands, my understanding of energy technologies, and my unwavering commitment to deliver for the people & places in NM & across our country.
The Senate just voted to send this year's NDAA to the President's desk, including key wins I secured for New Mexico's national labs & military installations & a historic pay raise for junior enlisted service members.
Congrats to UNM's own Dr. McConville on being selected to participate in this program! The latest example of New Mexicans leading the way on scientific innovations that will improve our quality of life, create high-quality careers, & grow our economy for the future. www.krqe.com/business/pre...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationYESNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESNOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (54-40)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-05-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 18Next →