Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Voting Record — 890
Yes34%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 55 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Thousands of abandoned mines pollute our ecosystems and threaten our watersheds in Colorado and across the West. I urge my House colleagues to vote in support of our bipartisan bill to clean up these mines, reduce pollution, and improve water quality.
Today, my legislation to help Good Samaritans clean up long-abandoned hardrock mines faces its final hurdle before it goes to the President's desk. I urge all of my colleagues in the House of Representatives to vote YES on this bipartisan, commonsense bill.
To safeguard the lands, waters, and way of life in the Pecos from the dangers of future mining, the Forest Service must complete initial steps of the mineral withdrawal process. This is how we ensure that future generations can continue to benefit from this critical watershed.
Today, my legislation to help Good Samaritans clean up long-abandoned hardrock mines faces its final hurdle before it goes to the President's desk. I urge all of my colleagues in the House of Representatives to vote YES on this bipartisan, commonsense bill.
Climate action is WAY cheaper than climate inaction. Democrats have made solid progress, but more is needed. And the longer we delay, the more expensive and catastrophic the consequences will be for future generations.
If the Department of the Interior gets its way, Las Cruces won’t have the water it needs to function, and neither will Ag producers. We need the Biden administration to step in to resolve the TX v. NM case without catastrophic damage. www.abqjournal.com/news/article...
Apprenticeships are good for workers, businesses, and local economies. That's why I led bipartisan legislation to support apprentice and pre-apprentice programs like Sophia’s at SMART Local 49.
The kids at Lincoln Elementary in Gallup, NM show up every day bright eyed and ready to learn – just like the students at all the 767 Title I schools in our state. Republicans’ Department of Education plans to slash funding for these schools slam a door in our kids’ faces.
The only thing that New Mexicans battling chronic kidney disease should have to worry about is getting better. That’s why I’ve introduced legislation to protect those with kidney failure from being kicked off of their health care when they need it most. www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/my_v...
Casting politics in terms of good and evil is dangerous and destructive. The "federal government" is your Social Security, it's your uncle's VA cancer treatment, it's the national park where your kids spent their vacation. We're better than this, America. subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eene...
Republicans’ economic plan: 1. Use tariffs to hike up prices on food, appliances, and other everyday goods. 2. Give tax handouts to the super rich. 3. Cut health care and nutrition programs Americans rely on. Sounds great for their wealthy donors... & terrible for working families.
Great to meet with folks from Protect Our Winters to highlight the progress we've made to protect our precious public lands and discuss the work ahead to tackle climate change and deliver a brighter future for the next generation.
CONFIRMED! Sarah Davenport has built an impressive legal career in New Mexico and has strong roots in her home community of Las Cruces. Proud to have secured her confirmation and look forward to her taking the bench in the District of New Mexico.
Tariffs won’t “bring back” American manufacturing—the investments Democrats have made in the last few years are already doing that. These tariffs are no more than a tax on hardworking families. www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-t...
New Mexicans rely on USPS to receive everything from paychecks to prescription medicine. I’m cosponsoring legislation that would require USPS to think twice before closing or downsizing rural mail processing facilities.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationYESNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESNOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (54-40)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-05-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 18Next →