Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 844
Yes34%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 46 sponsored · 258 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Fire mismanagement is life-or-death and risks billions in taxpayer dollars. DOGE’s mismanagement has already cost thousands of jobs at the Bureau of Land Management. We need proof that consolidating federal firefighting won’t make Americans less safe.
Photo and headline from Albuquerque Journal: 

Heinrich, Klobuchar ask Interior Secretary to Stop consolidating federal firefighting forces
Reservation systems help parks manage visitation numbers and protect the parks’ ecosystems and wildlife from large crowds. The Trump Administration is rolling back these systems, placing more strain on parks already struggling under Trump’s budget and staffing cuts.
Cars line up at the entrance to Yosemite National Park in California during heavy snow as a winter storm warning is issued, shown on Feb. 17, 2026. Headline from SFGate reads: National parks remove reservation systems despite crowds
The only thing Trump delivered last year was higher prices. In NM, it was an extra $1,355 for the average household. I'll keep fighting to lower costs because affordability isn't a made-up word. It’s the difference between saving for a vacation and moving in with your in-laws.
BlackVe is solidifying New Mexico as a leader in defense and space innovation. During my visit, I got to hear about how they are growing the space economy in New Mexico and creating jobs of the future in our state.
Senator Heinrich poses for a photo with BlackVe employees.
Trump’s tariffs made the things you bought last year more expensive. ☕ Coffee went up 33.6% 🐄 Ground beef went up 19.3% 🥬 Romaine lettuce went up 16.8% 🍊 Frozen orange juice went up 12.4% He cost the average household $1,000 in 2025. And that could go up to $1,300 this year.
Investing in our kids is investing in the future of our communities. This week I got to meet with students from Navajo Prep to discuss how the $2 million in federal funding I secured has gone to strengthen their STEAM program and building.
Senator Martin Heinrich poses for the camera with students, teachers, and administrators from Navajo Prep.
Navajo Prep principal presents Senator Martin Heinrich with a framed photo.
Students from Navajo Prep sit around a table and discuss their school and programs with Senator Martin Heinrich.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
844 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (48-46)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationYESNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESNOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (54-40)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 17Next →