Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byTina Smith
Trump claims he wants to lower housing costs, but his allies in the House just axed a bipartisan bill that UNANIMOUSLY passed the Senate to do just that. If Republicans keep blocking legislation to cut housing costs, Democrats will pass it ourselves when we take back Congress.
I don’t normally read the comments, but these ones give me hope. I know we are all seeing a lot of hate toward our Somali friends and neighbors, but I wanted to share these. I hope they bring a smile to your face like they did mine.
Thanksgiving is the perfect time for us to rest, recharge, spend time with our favorite people and eat some amazing food (I’m in charge of pies this year 🥧). Then, we get back to fighting the good fight.
This is their playbook: No warning, no transparency, no coordination. Their goal here isn’t safety, it’s to sow chaos, fear, and intimidation.
We’re still gathering information about what happened in St. Paul, but what we do know is that once again, federal authorities provided no notice to local leaders or law enforcement.
We’re still gathering information about what happened in St. Paul, but what we do know is that once again, federal authorities provided no notice to local leaders or law enforcement.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-06-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-41)
2025-06-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (48-46)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55YESYESPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55YESYESPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55NONOMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 18Next →