Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 846
Yes73%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 189 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byTina Smith
Andrea Pedro-Francisco was detained by immigration agents in early February on her way to work and was sent to a detention center in El Paso, Texas, just days before she was scheduled for surgery to remove a large ovarian cyst.
Beyond grateful that we were able to secure Andrea’s release. Her ovarian cyst could have lifesaving complications if left untreated, and she was in incredible pain. Now she’ll be able to get the lifesaving medical care she should have been able to receive back in February.
Pulte only got the job as acting Director of National Intelligence because he’s clearly willing to pursue baseless retribution against Trump’s perceived political enemies. What a joke – or at least it would be if this wasn’t such a serious job. Absolutely zero credibility.
So we’re supposed to believe the guy who wants his face on a $250 bill suddenly is just going to drop his demand for a slush fund?
Happy Pride!
🚨 BREAKING: A federal appeals court has ruled, in a 2-1 decision, that the Trump-Hegseth transgender military ban is likely unconstitutional, finding that the policy appears to be driven by a “bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group” and is “both arbitrary and based upon animus.” 1/3
Reposted byTina Smith
🚨 BREAKING: A federal appeals court has ruled, in a 2-1 decision, that the Trump-Hegseth transgender military ban is likely unconstitutional, finding that the policy appears to be driven by a “bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group” and is “both arbitrary and based upon animus.” 1/3
Nothing makes someone look guiltier than forcing the Justice Department to promise never to investigate your taxes or prosecute you for anything they might find
Straight from DC to the State Capitol in solidarity with Minnesotans pushing for gun safety legislation. Enough is enough. Hold the vote!
Photo of US Senator Tina Smith arriving in the Minnesota State Capitol to press for the House of Representatives to vote on gun safety legislation.
Photo of US Senator Tina Smith arriving in the Minnesota State Capitol to press for the House of Representatives to vote on gun safety legislation alongside Annunciation parents.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
846 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Blumenthal Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Armed Services with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Kaine Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-30Motion (Motion to Waive Section 313 (b)(1)(D) of the CBA Re: Amdt. No. 2401)YESYESMotion Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-30Motion (Motion to Waive Section 302(F) of the CBA Re: Murray Amdt. No. 2771)NONOMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-30Motion (Motion to Waive Section 313(b)(1)(D) of the Congressional Budget Act Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 2446)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-30Motion (Motion to Waive Section 313(b)(1)(D) of the CBA Re: Cornyn Amdt. No. 2705)YESYESMotion Rejected (56-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-30Motion (Motion to Waive Section 302(F) of the CBA Re: Amdt. No. 2414)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Blunt Rochester Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (48-52)
2025-06-30Motion (Motion to Waive Section 302(F) of the CBA Re: Amdt. No. 2696)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Reed Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (48-52)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Lujan Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (49-51)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (48-52)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (49-51)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Schumer Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Decision of the Chair H.R. 1YESYESDecision of Chair Sustained (53-47)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Decision of the Chair S.Amdt. 2360 to H.R. 1 (No short title on file)YESYESDecision of Chair Sustained (53-47)
2025-06-28H.R. 1 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2025-06-27S.J. Res. 59 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 59NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-26Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-25End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-06-25Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (56-40)
2025-06-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-06-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (61-35)
2025-06-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (58-33)
2025-06-18Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-18Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-18End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-46)
2025-06-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (68-30)
2025-06-17Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-17Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (57-40)
2025-06-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-06-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (46-39)
2025-06-16End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (44-33)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (67-30)
2025-06-12Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307)YESYESMotion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Failed (45-52)
2025-06-12Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 54 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 53 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S. 1582 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-11End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-06-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-06-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-41)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 17Next →