Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Horrific. We all need to condemn these acts of political violence that are becoming far too commonplace in this country. We can’t continue like this.
Reposted byTina Smith
So let me get this straight…20 years ago, Democrats forged Trump’s signature on a creepy birthday card to a pedophile...planted it in Epstein’s estate before Trump even ran…and then waited to release it until *after* Trump got reelected? Got it.
Leavitt: "The president has one of the most famous signatures in the world, and he has for many many years ... the president did not write that letter. He did not sign those documents. He maintains that position and that position will be argued in court."
Our health care system is broken, nobody disagrees with that... but “more prior authorizations” isn’t how we fix it. Certainly isn’t ‘MAHA’
Reposted byTina Smith
CNN put together a clip of RKF Jr denying today he linked antidepressants and mass shootings, followed by a clip of RFK Jr last week linking antidepressants and mass shootings
Minnesota can act to protect our kids. But we also need action at the national level.   Back to DC today. Our kids deserve better than R’s sitting back and saying there’s nothing we can do.
“If Minnesota lets this moment slide and we determine that it’s okay for little ones to not be safe in a school environment or a church environment, then shame on us,” Walz said. “I’m going to call (lawmakers) back.”
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-12End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 17 / 18Next →