Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

So much progress will be erased by this bill — millions lose health insurance, and for what? To give Jeff Bezos another tax break?
17 million people’s health insurance is not waste. If you’re looking for frauds, look at all the Republicans who promised not to cut Medicaid but did it anyways.
Now it’s up to all of us to continue the fight. As this bill returns to the House, make your voices heard. We say no to the largest role back in health care in our nation’s history, and the biggest transfer of wealth in modern times.
In Minnesota alone, nearly 200,000 people will lose their health insurance. Rural hospitals will be forced to close. Planned Parenthood will lose its funding and have to shutter clinics.
What Republicans did here is simple. They voted to kick 16 million people off health insurance while giving massive tax breaks to billionaires and corporations, and managed to still raise the debt by a staggering $5 trillion.
I worked at Planned Parenthood. They diagnose cancers while still treatable. They help women decide what birth control works for them. They help those working through mental health challenges.   Defunding them just harms people who already struggle to find places to get care.
It takes a serious level of cruelty to not only kick millions off their health insurance, but simultaneously tell you where you can and can’t go to get a Pap smear or breast cancer screening — if you’re deemed worthy enough to keep your health insurance in the first place.
🚨The GOP provision to DEFUND Planned Parenthood is staying in the Big Ugly bill. Clinics will shutter. Women will lose access to cancer screenings, birth control, and basic care. I will be forcing a vote to try to strip it out. Fight like hell. We need to kill this bill.
Reposted byTina Smith
🚨The GOP provision to DEFUND Planned Parenthood is staying in the Big Ugly bill. Clinics will shutter. Women will lose access to cancer screenings, birth control, and basic care. I will be forcing a vote to try to strip it out. Fight like hell. We need to kill this bill.
Just when I thought the big, beautiful bill couldn't get any worse, it has. If R's amendments go through, the number of Minnesotans losing health insurance will top 300,000.
Reposted byTina Smith
This isn’t over yet. Spread the word. Republicans' Big, Beautiful Bill would: — Kick 16 million off their health care — Close 1 out of 4 nursing homes — Hike your energy bills — Add at least $4 trillion to the national debt It’s a gift to the rich and a disaster for families.
If Republicans won’t fix the Big, Beautiful Bill, we’ll offer amendments to fix it ourselves. They will have every opportunity to join us and save peoples’ health care.
I was so grateful to be with Melissa and Mark Hortman’s families and so many Minnesotans yesterday at the State Capitol to honor them. Today I am watching with love from afar in Washington, present in spirit. May they rest in peace and may their memories bless us all.
It’s Saturday. The day Senate Republicans try to figure out how to take away Medicaid to pay for tax cuts for billionaires, but hope nobody notices. News Flash: people will notice.
Not that he had much respect for the supposedly co-equal branch of the Judiciary in the first place…
Justice Sotomayor’s dissent in today’s birthright citizenship case is a wake up call for all of us: “No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates”   SCOTUS is essentially deciding to look the other way as Trump infringes on our rights and breaks our laws.
Justice Sotomayor’s dissent in today’s birthright citizenship case is a wake up call for all of us: “No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates”   SCOTUS is essentially deciding to look the other way as Trump infringes on our rights and breaks our laws.
Sgt. Rodriguez was an exemplary public servant. Her dedication to keeping Minnesotans safe, and her commitment to helping people find a place to live was transformative. She helped to make our state a better place.    May her memory be a blessing.
Authorities say a woman who died after going missing in the waters of White Bear Lake on Sunday afternoon was a Metro Transit police sergeant. Beverly Rodriguez joined Metro Transit police in 2017 and led its Homeless Action Team.
It’s late, and I’m trying every way I know how to get home tomorrow to honor them as they lie in state in the Rotunda of the State Capitol. I’m thinking about how much they loved each other and their family, and how much they loved Minnesota and our country. That’s inspiration for all of us.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-06-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-41)
2025-06-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (48-46)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55YESYESPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55YESYESPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55NONOMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 18Next →