Tammy got me with this one… @baldwin.senate.gov
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byTina Smith
BREAKING: The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control program for testing milk and other dairy products.
The agency is citing reduced capacity. It has 20,000 fewer employees as a result of the DOGE cuts under Trump and Musk.
It was clear from the start that Hegseth was incompetent, and his incompetence would make all of us less safe. Especially those that serve in the military.
The question is when will Republicans finally call for him to be gone.
Deeply saddened by the passing of Pope Francis today. He inspired all of us with his selflessness, humility and service to the world’s poorest and most marginalized.
Archie and I are keeping Catholic Minnesotans in our thoughts today. May he rest in peace.
Happy Easter, Minnesota!
Defunding assistance for families and seniors to keep their homes warm and safe through the winter is just cruel.
These guys do this kind of thing because they’re so rich they couldn’t even fathom needing help to keep the heat on, and if it doesn’t benefit them, it needs to be cut.
It got down to -35 in International Falls this winter.
The Lindbo’s are just one family out of tens of thousands in Minnesota who rely on Medical Assistance to get the care they need.
We should be making Medicaid work better, not kicking people off of it by cutting its funding.
Housing is one of the most important parts of your life. Without it, nothing - from your health care to your education - works.
Ten organizations across the state will now have the resources to continue their work for Minnesotans in underserved areas.
We could all use some good news these days, and I’m happy to share it.
Key HUD funding which helps boost housing supply, support small businesses, and strengthen our workforce, was stalled by Trump/Musk. But after grassroots organizing + support all across the country, that funding was restored.
Reposted byTina Smith
I said my main goal of this trip was to meet with Kilmar. Tonight I had that chance. I have called his wife, Jennifer, to pass along his message of love. I look forward to providing a full update upon my return.
Who wins here? Not veterans who use an already understaffed VA. Not workers left in limbo. I’m not seeing ANYONE who wins.
And it’s not just this CNA — this Administration is just leaving workers with offers in a state of limbo, and in this economy, not knowing if you’re going to get hired for months isn’t an option for a lot of families.
You’d be hard pressed to find ANY hospital that isn’t in need of a CNA, but apparently vets had to wait until Musk deemed this worker worthy.
A nursing assistant at the VA had their offer rescinded, then restored, then paused, until finally being hired after months of back and forth because of this Administration.
Only ¼ of eligible families currently get vouchers to help cover their rent. A lot of these families could become homeless or be put on the brink of homelessness if we cut Section 8 funding.
Just a cruel move that will only make the housing crisis worse and harm millions of families.
NEW: The White House is preparing a budget that could include deep cuts to federal housing funds, and a reconfiguration of housing vouchers/Section 8 that may result in low-income families losing aid. Many told me the details are hazy, but the result is fewer dollars www.nytimes.com/2025/04/17/u...
I’ve been in real world Minnesota today hearing how Trump cuts to Medicaid will shut down rural hospitals.
So pardon me if I don’t have patience with JD Vance trying to change the subject.
Reposted byTina Smith
Great to be in Luverne with @smith.senate.gov to celebrate the opening of the new Kids Rock Child Care Center!
We worked together to secure federal funding for this new center, which will make a big difference for kids, families and businesses by expanding child care options.
If there’s one thing from my visit to a rural hospital in Hendricks, Minnesota everyone should know, it’s this: We should be talking about how we can improve Medicaid… not kicking people off of it.
The entire Upper Midwest is going to suffer long-term economic pain from these blanket tariffs.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-41) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-41) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-38) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-44) |
| 2025-05-21 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | YES | YES | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | YES | YES | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-52) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (46-52) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S. 1582 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31) |
| 2025-05-19 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-19 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-19 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-05-15 | S. Res. 195 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-05-15 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.