Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 789
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 183 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The next time you hear Republicans mention tax cuts, ask yourself: For who? Because unless you’re in the top 5%, it’s probably not you.
Graph titled: trumps tax proposals cut taxes for the richest 5% while raising taxes for other groups.
This is corruption in plain sight. Musk is getting sweetheart deals for his companies, DOGE is helping him do it, and the President is cheering him on. This isn’t about government efficiency, but making him richer.
The FAA may cancel a $2.4 billion contract with Verizon and instead give it to Starlink, owned by Elon Musk, WaPo reports. This would be his latest opportunity to get richer off of taxpayers. Musk and his businesses have received $38 billion in federal contracts and subsidies.
Some more Minnesotans that have been screwed by Musk/Trump: * Forest Service worker who helps loggers sell timber * Veteran at the VA (who rooted out waste!) * Another veteran at the Small Business Administration who helped startups
Let’s call this what it is: A closed-door meeting where Republicans huddle up and find out how they can give boatloads of our money to the richest among us and leave pennies for everyone else. They’ll pay for it by defunding Medicaid, which ~40% of kids rely on. The villains in any story book.
Ben Guggenheim (@ben_guggenheim): NEW: White House to begin hosting weekly tax discussions with congressional leadership -> Including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Speaker Mike Johnson, Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith and Finance Chair Mike Crapo
How can you tell that Trump and Musk don’t actually care about going after waste and fraud? They just fired someone at the Minnesota VA whose job was to find waste/inefficiencies to save taxpayer money. It’s all a façade to shell out more money for billionaires and big corporations.
Reposted byTina Smith
Sharp cuts at the Department of Housing and Urban Development are likely to upend housing markets, make homes less affordable and roil mortgage transactions, according to current and former employees, contractors and housing experts.
That’s Tammy Baldwin — not me. You can keep track of all the hundreds of white men but it’s the 28 women in the Senate that trips you up, Fox News?
Fox News Headline: Sen Smith (D-MN), Musk Trade Blows Over DOGE

Photo: side by side of Sen. Tammy Baldwin and Elon Musk.
How far have we fallen as a country that we are siding with Russia and North Korea to vote against condemning Russia's actions in Ukraine?
Today, the US stood with Russia and North Korea — and against our allies — in voting against a UN resolution to condemn Russia's aggression against Ukraine. Let that sink in. This is a betrayal of the Ukrainian people, our allies, our interests and those who aspire for freedom.
People are mad, and we should be. We know when we’re being scammed. In the name of “efficiency” Musk is firing park rangers and cancer researchers, and defunding Medicare and Medicaid, all to find money for tax breaks for himself and big corporations.
Mark Alford (R-MO): Elon Musk has contracts with the federal government, but he is also, I think, doing an effective job at weeding out the waste, abuse, and fraud in the government. Constituents: BOOO!!! SHOW ME!!! CONFLICT OF INTEREST!!! HE IS THE WASTE, FRAUD, AND ABUSE!!!
They’re letting a megalomaniac billionaire desperate for validation play President – if you’re surprised people are pissed, you need to get out of your DC bubble. Nothing more American than hating a bad boss, especially an illegitimate one like Musk. Republicans just don’t like being called on it.
Elon, I hate to break it to you but you aren’t my boss. I answer to the people of Minnesota. But since you bring it up, I spent last week fighting to stop tax breaks for billionaires like you, paid for by defunding health care for moms and babies
Senator Tina Smith said: This is the ultimate dick boss move from Musk - except he isn’t even the boss, he’s just a dick.

That was in response to Musk saying “Consistent with President @realDonaldTrump's instructions, all federal employees will shortly receive an email requesting to understand what they got done last week. Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.”

Musk responded @SenTinaSmith “What did you get done last week?”
I bet a lot of people have had an experience like this with a bad boss - there’s an email in your inbox on Saturday night saying, “Prove to me your worthiness by Monday or else.” I’m on the side of the workers, not the billionaire asshole bosses.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233)NONOMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (24-76)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172)NONOMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276)NONOMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776)NONOMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (51-49)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130)NONOMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494)NONOMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454)NONOMotion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-49)
2025-02-20End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-19Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-02-18S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-02-18Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-18Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45)
2025-02-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2025-02-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (72-28)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-12End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 16Next →