Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Elon Musk illegally seized the purse strings of the United States. An unelected billionaire may have access to everyone’s social security numbers.   We need answers now. This power grab cannot stand.
Reposted byTina Smith
Senator Smith: What’s so horrible about this moment is that dozens of families are trying to be united with the remains of their loved ones because they died. And what does Trump do? He tries to turn it into a political thing. He is incapable of taking responsibility for anything he has ever done.
It was great to join @ivehaditpodcast.bsky.social to talk about what we’re doing in the Senate to keep up the fight against Donald Trump and his billionaire friends.
Reposted byTina Smith
Hassan, through tears: "I am the proud mother of a 36 year old with severe cerebral palsy. And a day does not go by when I don't think about what I did I do when I was pregnant with him... So please do not suggest that anybody in this body doesn't want to know what the cause of autism is" Powerful
Avian flu has killed more than 100 million animals across the country, and the first human death was just reported. It’s a challenge I’m going to make sure the next HHS Secretary takes seriously.
Americans woke up yesterday morning not knowing if they could still get their health insurance through Medicaid, or drop their child off at daycare. The Trump Admin is trying to walk this back because the American people were clear. This is not what they voted for.
“Do you think people who take anti-depressants are dangerous?" The answer is no. Another of RFK Jr’s fringe ideas. The HHS Secretary should be fighting the stigma around mental health not fanning the flames of conspiracy theories.
The American people are looking for some reassurance that the decisions they make about abortion are personal and private. It’s hard for me to respect people who won’t give me a straight answer.
Medicare and Medicaid aren’t the same thing - I’d think someone who wants to run our country’s health system should know that.
Tweet by Julie Rovner stating “RFKjr keeps talking about Medicaid premiums. Medicaid, with few exceptions, doesn't HAVE premiums.  (He's thinking of Medicare)”
Medicaid payments nationwide weren’t working yesterday. RFK Jr. is proving at this hearing that he doesn’t even understand the basics of the program. He’s a danger to American’s health.
Mifepristone HAS been studied over and over again and deemed safe and effective — that’s why it’s been approved for over two decades!
Tweet from Sam Stein that reads “RFK signals he would declare Mifepristone unsafe or at least open it up to studies that could result it in being declared unsafe.”
On top of the shitstorm that was the past 24 hours, Trump illegally gutted the NLRB. This move is a terrible sign of what’s to come. It emboldens his allies (who just happen to lead billion-dollar corporations) to line their pockets at the expense of their employees.
1/ Trump’s firing of Gwynne Wilcox, the first Black woman on the NLRB, is illegal and undermines workers' fundamental right to organize.
I’ve heard from community health centers in Minnesota who are already looking at layoffs by the end of the day. May not be able to make payroll at the end of the week. Republicans need to grow a spine here. This isn’t a game, it’s people’s lives.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (69-27)
2025-12-17Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (67-30)
2025-12-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (67-30)
2025-12-17S. 1071 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESMotion Agreed to (77-20)
2025-12-15S. 1071 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-11S. 1071 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (75-22)
2025-12-11S. Res. 532 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESResolution Agreed to (52-47)
2025-12-11S. 3385 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-11S. 3386 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-10S. Res. 532 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-12-10S.J. Res. 82 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-49)
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-12-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-46)
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-12-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-12-08End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-12-04Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (57-32)
2025-12-04S. Res. 520 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Rejected (43-37, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-04H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (49-45)
2025-12-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (63-34)
2025-12-03S.J. Res. 91 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (49-47)
2025-12-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (57-41)
2025-12-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (56-40)
2025-12-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (60-39)
2025-12-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (61-36)
2025-12-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-12-01End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-41)
2025-11-20H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-43)
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 76 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (46-51)
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-11-19Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (66-32)
2025-11-18End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (65-32)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (60-40)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (60-40)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (76-24)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Failed (47-53)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Failed (47-53)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (60-40)
2025-11-09H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-07S. 3012 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-43, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-06S.J. Res. 90 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 90NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (49-51)
2025-11-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (57-43)
2025-11-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-11-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-11-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-11-04H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 18Next →