Later, I was VP of Planned Parenthood – North Central States, where every day I saw people walk through the doors of our clinic fully capable of making their own decisions about abortion, their bodies and their lives without some politician interfering.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
A little background: I got my start in politics as an organizer and volunteer for local democratic candidates in Minnesota.
Hello (again) Bluesky! I’m going to start posting here again, because that other app has become a disaster.
But first, I want to introduce myself. My name is Tina Smith, and I’m a proud United States Senator for Minnesota… ⬇️
Cancelled/delayed flights are costly and stressful, especially when traveling to visit loved ones.
Excellent news from the Biden-Harris Administration as we enter the holiday season.
Our housing crisis can't be solved by just one level of government. It's going to take all of us.
We need to come together at every level - from local governments all the way up to the United States Senate - to ensure everyone has a quality, affordable place to call home.
100,000 riders in five months blows past expectations and proves (once again) that investing in passenger rail pays off.
If you build it, they will come.
I’ve long advocated for more support for beginning and emerging farmers.
I chaired a hearing on it.
I sponsor legislation to reauthorize this grant program.
I have legislation to increase land access, capital access, and market access for underserved farmers.
This is a matter of national security, food security, and the strength and vitality of rural America.
Agriculture is a driving force in America’s economy, and this grant will make sure our Ag economy is strong as the next generation of farmers takes over.
The average age of a producer in the United States is 58, and in Minnesota it’s 57. And of course, this number increases every year.
That in a nutshell is why we need to invest in the next generation of farmers, so this country’s agriculture production continues to work.
Corporate landlords have no right to exploit American renters just trying to find a place they are proud to call home.
That's why @aoc.bsky.social and I introduced the Homes Act - to empower communities with new, affordable housing options, and to protect tenants' rights.
We know there’s more work ahead. We need to solve this problem once and for all.I introduced the Housing for All Veterans Act, which would guarantee a housing voucher to every veteran who needs one.
We’ll finish the job and make sure everyone has a place to call home.
In the past 15 years, the federal government and communities like ours have committed to ending veteran homelessness.
Senator Klobuchar and I pushed for the increased federal funding that helped fuel this work in Hennepin County and across Minnesota, and we are seeing results.
BREAKING: Veteran homelessness in Hennepin County just reached ‘functional zero’.
This milestone is years in the making. Now, we should take what's working in Minnesota and implement it on a national scale.
The Biden-Harris Administration says help is on the way, and the head of FEMA has been embedded in Florida at the state emergency operations center to stay briefed by local and state officials.
Our entire country is behind them.
Absolutely devastating – as we begin to see more heartbreaking images of the damage Hurricane Milton has done to Florida, just remember: Florida won't rebuild alone.
This project shows what’s possible when the federal government partners with states, cities and nonprofits to create housing for the good of the community.
Let's empower communities to build more housing like this by passing my Homes Act.
There isn’t enough safe, affordable, quality housing in Greater Minnesota.
Yesterday, I toured Brewery Creek Apartments, which will provide 52 affordable units of housing — half of which are set aside for young people experiencing homelessness around Duluth.
All Minnesotans should have access to clean, safe drinking water.
Replacing lead pipes is about the health and well-being of Minnesota families across the state, and I’m fully behind this move by the Biden-Harris Administration.
This wouldn’t be possible without the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the advocates and utilities who are making Minnesota a leader in the clean energy transition.
I was excited to join folks up in Hermantown to celebrate!
Minnesota Power is making big upgrades to our electric grid – and it will mean cheaper, cleaner, more reliable power for homes & businesses.
These upgrades are seriously needed. The existing infrastructure is nearly 50 years old, well beyond its typical 30-year design life.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.