Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 66
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 772
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 180 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The transition to clean energy is going to happen. The only question is if the United States will lead the transition or follow behind China. Projects like this show that clean energy just makes good sense — even in cold states like ours.
Winona Area Public Schools secured $5.5 million in federal tax credits through the Inflation Reduction Act for installing the energy-efficient system. Even better, the geo system will pay for itself with its energy savings.
The system regulates the school temperature by harnessing the earth’s natural heat as energy to keep the building warm in the winter + cool in the summer. It’s a cheaper way to heat/cool the school, doesn’t tie them to the ups and downs of a global oil/gas market and is clean, American-made energy.
Photo of Tina Smith receiving a tour of a geothermal dehumidification system.
Photo of a control panel.
Photo of a pipe with text that reads “CHILLED WATER RETURN SECONDARY”
Pipe with the text “HEATING WATER RETURN”
Two of Winona’s public elementary schools installed something great. It’s nerdy, so bear with me… ✨geothermal dehumidification systems✨
Photo of a Winona, Minnesota elementary school.
The transition to clean energy is going to happen. The only question is if the United States will lead the transition or follow behind China. Projects like this show that clean energy just makes good sense — even in cold states like ours.
Winona Area Public Schools secured $5.5 million in federal tax credits through the Inflation Reduction Act for installing the energy-efficient system. Even better, the geo system will pay for itself with its energy savings.
The system regulates the school temperature by harnessing the earth’s natural heat as energy to keep the building warm in the winter + cool in the summer. It’s a cheaper way to heat/cool the school, doesn’t tie them to the ups and downs of a global oil/gas market and is clean, American-made energy.
Photo of Tina Smith receiving a tour of a geothermal dehumidification system.
Photo of a control panel.
Photo of a pipe with text that reads “CHILLED WATER RETURN SECONDARY”
Pipe with the text “HEATING WATER RETURN”
Two of Winona’s public elementary schools installed something great. It’s nerdy, so bear with me… ✨geothermal dehumidification systems✨
Photo of a Winona, Minnesota elementary school.
Even under the now-halted FDA policy, patients still had to talk to their provider before getting medication for an abortion. This just bans telehealth appointments because anti-choice politicians want to make it as inconvenient and difficult as possible to get mifepristone.
We should all be paying attention to what this means. Getting rid of Roe wasn’t the end game and they will go further. Anti choice extremists in state legislatures are teaming up with allies on the federal bench to take your freedom to control the course of your life.
Minnesota and countless other states have proven how we can safely decriminalize and regulate the cannabis industry. Long overdue for the federal government to take a page out of that playbook.
Reposted byTina Smith
Last week, the U.S. Senate passed a devastating bill that will undo protections for the Boundary Waters. Listen to this feature on NPR's All Things Considered featuring Explorers Amy and Dave Freemans and @smith.senate.gov discussing what this means for the wilderness. www.npr.org/2026/04/18/n...
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
772 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-17End debateYESYESCloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-16S. Con. Res. 22 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (36-62)
2025-09-16S.J. Res. 60 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-51)
2025-09-15Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (48-47)
2025-09-15End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2025-09-15S. Res. 377 (119th)Resolution S.Res. 377YESYESResolution Agreed to (51-44)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)Decision of the Chair S.Res. 377NONODecision of Chair Not Sustained (45-53)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)Motion to Reconsider S.Res. 377YESYESMotion to Reconsider Agreed to (52-45)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-10S. 2296 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (51-49)
2025-09-09S. Res. 377 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-09S. Res. 377 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-09-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-09-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-09-09End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-09-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-09-08Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-43)
2025-09-04S. 2296 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (83-13)
2025-09-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-02S. 2296 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (71-23)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (72-22)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-35)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-42)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (78-17)
2025-08-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-19)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-45)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-44)
2025-08-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-08-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-41)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (81-15)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (21-75)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (15-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (14-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (45-50)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (42-53)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (44-51)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 16Next →