The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that the Administration must work to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia home. He was wrongfully deported.
I joined @vanhollen.senate.gov in calling on the Administration to immediately comply with the court order and bring him back.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota
Amy Klobuchar
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes35%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 95 sponsored · 461 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I’m on the road for the Social Security Day of Action. A million Minnesotans (many of them in rural) depend on social security for their income. They’ve earned it. They should be able to keep it. This Adminstration is closing field offices & making it HARDER to get benefits.
The expanded Child Tax Credit worked and cut child poverty nearly in half.
I'm working with @warnock.senate.gov and @democrats.senate.gov to reinstate this critical lifeline.
Thank you, Beth, for sharing your story. These across-the-board tariffs are absolutely devastating our small business owners in Minnesota and across the country, and they must be reversed.
The Timberwolves are playoff-bound! Let’s go, Wolves! 🎉🐺
Sodsaver provisions support outdoor recreation, save taxpayer dollars, and preserve wildlife habitat.
That’s why I am reintroducing bipartisan legislation to strengthen these provisions in the next Farm Bill.
I spoke about the bipartisan effort I'm leading with Senator Blackburn to end the human trafficking crisis, provide resources to victims, and give law enforcement better tools to crack down on this heinous crime.
Watch:
We should not raise costs, hurt businesses, and eliminate jobs by attacking Canada, our neighbor and ally.
Congress must pass my bipartisan legislation with @kaine.senate.gov to stop President Trump from using emergency powers to start an unjustified trade war.
Trump’s global trade war has tanked consumer sentiment and will raise costs for American families—Congress must pass my legislation to stop Trump’s senseless global tariffs, which amount to a new national sales tax.
www.cnn.com/2025/04/11/e...
Stop 4 on my 19 county rural tour: Grant County!
I sat down with local community leaders in Elbow Lake to discuss the impacts of proposed tariffs on the rural economy and how I'm working to protect American consumers and small business owners.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
I joined @klobuchar.senate.gov in a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer for answers on Trump’s tariffs.
We must protect agriculture trade relationships for IL farmers.
Chag Sameach to everyone celebrating Passover in Minnesota and around the world!
Today is the grand opening of the North End Community Center in Saint Paul!
I helped secure federal funding for this important project which included improvements to the park, new gathering spaces, and a new playground.
We were joined in Washington by artists, including singer Randy Travis and his wife, Mary, to support the NO FAKES Act.
Our bipartisan bill will protect people from having their voice & likeness replicated through AI without their permission.
Stop 3 of my 19 county rural tour: Fergus Falls!
I stopped by the Minnesota Veterans Home, where I had the honor to meet WWII veterans Harry (103) and Tony (100).
Looking out for our men and women who served isn't a red issue or a blue issue — it's an American issue.
Chris Krebs was a faithful public servant who helped lead efforts to secure the 2020 election.
Now, he’s the latest target in Donald Trump’s revenge tour.
Stop 2 of my 19 county rural tour: Wilkin County!
Thanks to the Hasbargen family for welcoming me to their farm!
Family farms are critical to rural economies, and we must ensure they have the resources they need.
Stop one of my 19 county tour: Moorhead!
In Minnesota and across the country, tariffs have created uncertainty for families, farmers, and small business owners.
I spoke with Sean, owner of Swing Barrel Brewing, about the impact of tariffs on small businesses.
It was great to meet the St. Cloud Chamber of Commerce this week while they were in Washington!
We discussed the need to invest in our workforce and take down barriers to employment, the impact of tariffs on Minnesota businesses, and the state of the economy.
In Minnesota and across the country, President Trump has created uncertainty for small business owners, farmers, and consumers with his tariff tax chaos.
We’ve taken action in the Senate to reverse President Trump’s tariff taxes on Canada. Republicans in the House should remember they are not subjects to a king.
They need to listen to their constituents and end this chaos and confusion.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-08 | S. 5271 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (61-32) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
| 2026-07-28 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-07-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2026-07-23 | S.J. Res. 180 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-44) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-36) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2026-07-21 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-48) |
| 2026-07-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (43-40) |
| 2026-07-16 | S.J. Res. 198 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-50) |
| 2026-07-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-14 | S. 4784 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2026-07-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (46-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 185 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 196 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-23 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2026-06-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-30) |
| 2026-06-22 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (85-5) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 18Next →