PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Jeff Merkley headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Oregon
Born
October 24, 1956
Age 69
Phone
(202) 224-3753
Office
531 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Oregon

Jeff Merkley

Jeffrey Alan Merkley is an American politician who is the junior United States senator from Oregon. He was first elected to the Senate in 2008. A member of the Democratic Party, he served from 1999 to 2009 as the representative for the 47th district in the Oregon House of Representatives, which covers central Multnomah County on the eastern side of Portland, Oregon; he was the speaker of the Oregon House of Representatives during the last two years of his tenure.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes28%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenJeffMerkleyFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Jeff Merkley headshot
Jeff Merkley
U.S. SenatorDemocratOregon
SoupScore
Jeff's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 108 sponsored · 444 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted bySenator Jeff Merkley
Congressional Equality Caucus@equality.house.govAug 26(source)
Today, 187 Members of Congress—led by Equality Caucus Chair @repmarktakano.bsky.social & Vice Chair @reptedlieu.bsky.social & @merkley.senate.gov—filed a brief urging SCOTUS to protect young LGBTQI+ people and uphold Colorado's ban on so-called "conversion therapy." Link in bio for more info.
Takano, Lieu, & Merkley lead 187 members of congress in Filing Brief to Support Conversion Therapy Bans at SCOTUS. IMAGE: The United States Supreme Court.
Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govAug 25(source)
Our National Parks are being pushed to the limit without the staffing and funding they need.   I championed a bill to fully fund our parks that passed out of the Senate Appropriations Committee with overwhelming bipartisan support—we need to get it across the finish line.
Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govAug 25(source)
Community Warehouse in Portland turns surplus furniture into support for families who need it most! They’re taking powerful, practical strides to support housing stability and human dignity. Such important work! www.forbes.com/sites/jeremy...
The Furniture Gap: Solving A Hidden Crisis For American Families
Furniture poverty is hitting many low-income families. Accessing housing falls short when they lack a bed, table, or chairs to make it a home.
Reposted bySenator Jeff Merkley
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz@wassermanschultz.house.govAug 20(source)
The Everglades internment camp threatens human rights, due process, Tribal interests and this sensitive environment. @merkley.senate.gov and I led 60+ Democrats to demand transparency and answers from DHS. abcnews.go.com/US/democrati...
Democratic lawmakers demand information about 'Alligator Alcatraz'
A group of congressional Democrats is pushing officials at the DHS for more information about the use of the immigration detention facility dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz."
Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govAug 20(source)
@wassermanschultz.house.gov and I teamed up to demand answers from the Trump Administration on the cruel and dangerous Alligator Alcatraz facility—an independent, unaccountable detention system that threatens human rights and due process for migrants.
Democratic lawmakers demand information about 'Alligator Alcatraz'
A group of congressional Democrats is pushing officials at the DHS for more information about the use of the immigration detention facility dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz."
Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govAug 19(source)
Hell No. Folks in red and blue states alike—including Oregon—have been voting by mail for years. It’s convenient, secure, and counters corrupt Election Day tactics–like understaffing precinct voting centers–designed to obstruct voting in targeted communities.
Trump says he will lead 'movement' to end mail-in voting
President Trump said on Monday that that he will lead a movement to get rid of mail-in ballots, claiming, without providing evidence, that it leads to voter fraud.
Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govAug 18(source)
Last month, we passed a bill to ban congressional stock trading out of a Senate committee—the first step toward this becoming law. I’ve been sounding the alarm for years on this. It’s way past time we got this done!
Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govAug 13(source)
@lujan.senate.gov and I introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act because the American people deserve the truth about Epstein and those connected to him. Republicans BLOCKED it.
Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govAug 13(source)
We need to stop Big Pharma’s price gouging in its tracks and protect patients from sky high Rx drug prices! That’s why I wrote the End Price Gouging for Medications Act—we need to get this passed!
Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govAug 13(source)
Republicans voted to rip health care and food assistance away from millions of people and to ADD $3.4 TRILLION to the debt, all so billionaires could get a massive tax break. Terrible.
Reposted bySenator Jeff Merkley
Senate Budget Committee@senatebudget.bsky.socialAug 11(source)
🚨New CBO Analysis Confirms Republicans’ Big Ugly Law Steals from the Poor, Gives to the Ultra-Rich   Statement from Ranking Member @merkley.senate.gov, @schumer.senate.gov, @hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social, and Rep. Boyle here: www.budget.senate.gov/ranking-memb...
New CBO Analysis Confirms Republicans’ Big Ugly Law Steals from the Poor, Gives to the Ultra-Rich | U.S. Senate Committee On The Budget
The Official U.S. Senate Committee On The Budget
Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govAug 12(source)
Trump sending the National Guard to Washington, D.C. is a frighteningly clear escalation of his efforts to push us into an authoritarian strongman state. As he tests the limits of his power, I’ll fight against attacks on D.C. home rule every step of the way.
← Newer postsPosts page 46Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2025-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-41)
2025-06-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-06-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-46)
2025-06-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNO—Joint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONO✓Point of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONO✓Point of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55YESYES✓Motion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21—Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21—Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21—Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21—Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21—Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 18Next →