Jon Ossoff headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Georgia
Born
February 16, 1987
Age 39
Phone
(202) 224-3521
Office
317 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Georgia

Jon Ossoff

Thomas Jonathan Ossoff is an American politician who has served as the senior United States senator from Georgia since 2021. A member of the Democratic Party, he is the youngest incumbent U.S. senator. Before his election to Congress, he was a documentary and investigative filmmaker.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 772
Yes30%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align95%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jon Ossoff headshot
Jon Ossoff
U.S. SenatorDemocratGeorgia
SoupScore
Jon's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 76 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

“There’s no worse nightmare for any family than having a loved one who’s sick, but who cannot get the health care they need,” Sen. Ossoff said. “That’s why I brought Republicans and Democrats together to strengthen health care services for Georgia families.” www.wrganews.com/2026/04/29/a...
NEW: After reports that the CDC's Atlanta Campus is still in need of repairs following last year’s shooting — including bullet holes still in windows — Sen. Ossoff and @warnock.senate.gov are pressing Secretary Kennedy for updates.
Dear Secretary Kennedy, We urgently write to request an update on the status of building repairs security improvements necessary for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Eight months ago, CDC employees in Atlanta, Georgia were horrifically attacked. On August 8, 2025, a gunman approached the Clifton campus and fired hundreds of rounds into six buildings that pierced 150 blast-resistant windows. The gunman tragically killed responding DeKalb County Police Officer David Rose. Thanks to his bravery, and the many other law enforcement officials who rushed to respond to the shooting, the threat was neutralized and the campus was secured. In the aftermath, images of hundreds of the bullet holes in the windows of multiple windows were made public. Shockingly, those bullet holes remain today. This is unacceptable. You must take immediate action to repair and safeguard the CDC Atlanta campus. In the wake of the shooting, we called on CDC’s then Acting Director James O’Neill to conduct a thorough analysis of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and CDC’s security
protocols, to work with the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigations to identify any threats to the CDC federal workforce and establish additional security protocols, and to pause any terminations or restructuring of CDC divisions & staff. We received no response
to our Congressional inquiry. Instead, CDC leadership required its personnel to return to work within two weeks of the shooting, leaving the bullet-damaged buildings & windows unrepaired. Two months after the shooting, more than 1,300 CDC scientists, doctors, & health
officials were fired. Congress appropriated Fiscal Year 2026 funding for HHS two months ago and directed HHS to fund $100 million in necessary repairs & security improvements at the CDC campus. While we appreciate CDC employees have reportedly been notified that repairs will in fact happen, we remain concerned about the timeline of the work.
Please respond in writing within the next 30 calendar days, providing details of the work to be
completed, the timeline in which that work will begin and is projected to be completed by, and
the measures HHS has taken to implement security improvements for the CDC Atlanta campus.
Further, we request a detailed briefing for our legislative staff on the progress of restoring the
CDC campus. We look forward to your response.
This weekend, Sen. Ossoff led his 5th annual Military Service Academy Day at Dobbins Air Reserve Base, where high school students and their families learned more about the application and nomination process for the five U.S. Service Academies.
Sen. Ossoff: "The American people need to know that the President of the United States is fundraising for his political campaign and his PAC using images of American servicemembers killed in action, and it's a disgrace."
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
772 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-04-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (83-14)
2025-04-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (84-13)
2025-04-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (60-36)
2025-04-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-36)
2025-04-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-39)
2025-04-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-39)
2025-04-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (67-29)
2025-04-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (64-27)
2025-04-11Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (60-25)
2025-04-11End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-25)
2025-04-11Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-26)
2025-04-11End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-25)
2025-04-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-46)
2025-04-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-10H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 20YESNOJoint Resolution Passed (53-44)
2025-04-09H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Begin considerationYESNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42)
2025-04-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-04-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-04-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-04-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (60-37)
2025-04-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-04-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-04-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-42)
2025-04-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-04-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-04-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-08Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (66-32)
2025-04-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-32)
2025-04-08Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-04-07End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-39)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept House changesNONOConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (5-94)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-51)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 16Next →