Trump wants YOU to pay for his billionaire tax breaks.
We’re not gonna stand for it.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|California
Alex Padilla
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes25%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Alex Padilla
U.S. SenatorDemocratCalifornia
SoupScore
Alex's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 89 sponsored · 399 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump’s signature move? Trillions in tax breaks for his wealthy friends and corporations, while leaving families to pay the price.
When is enough enough?
As the use of AI chatbots grows more popular, I am pushing for answers from leading tech companies on how they are ensuring their products are safe to use––especially for children. edition.cnn.com/2025/04/03/t...
Working families are paying more today than they were before Trump became president.
Why? Because Trump lied on the campaign trail.
He’s not lowering costs for working families, he’s lowering taxes for his wealthy donors.
I was honored to join Senator Booker today as he continues to stand strong on the floor and stand up for Americans across the country.
We’re standing with you, Cory!
Everyone deserves to live as their authentic self.
On Trans Day of Visibility, we honor that truth and renew our commitment to a future where everyone can live safely and freely. I won’t stop fighting for it.🏳️⚧️
Trump’s top security officials were caught openly sharing classified information and putting our troops at risk, yet he refuses to take action.
Why is Trump afraid to hold his team accountable?
I had the opportunity to thank the outstanding service members from California who are stationed at Naval Station Guantánamo Bay working hard despite the challenging circumstances.
Yesterday, I joined my colleagues in traveling to Naval Station Guantánamo Bay to conduct oversight on Trump’s unlawful and wasteful efforts to relocate and detain migrants there.
Who else is ready for Opening Day?! #GoDodgers
How is gutting the agency that oversees public health, pandemic preparedness, medical research and food and drug safety going to "Make America Healthy Again"? edition.cnn.com/2025/03/27/h...
They were asked under oath if war plans were discussed, and they lied.
They put our troops at risk, and they lied.
We need accountability now. www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
I visited San Diego's Rady's Children's Hospital this week to hear directly from families who rely on Medicaid to access essential health care for their kids.
Trump and Republicans want to gut Medicaid to fund tax cuts for billionaires.
We're going to fight them on it.
Trump’s tariffs are a tax on American families. Plain and simple. www.cnn.com/2025/03/09/b...
Las tarifas de Trump van a aumentar los precios y el costo de vida para las familias Latinas.
The single biggest contributor to our national debt in recent decades?
Trump’s tax cuts from his first term.
And now he wants a $4.5 trillion tax cut for billionaires paid for by cutting YOUR Medicaid and Social Security.
On #InternationalWomensDay, we celebrate the incredible women who have shaped our lives.
Let’s honor them by advancing equality, protecting health care, and ensuring safety for all women.
Trump knew that opening the dams in the Central Valley would be wasteful, dangerous, and ineffective––but he did it anyway.
Dangerous and stupid publicity stunt. www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...
California firefighters have our backs, we have to make sure we have theirs.
Proud to have Frank & Vincent as our guests tonight.
Trump and Republicans aren’t “cutting waste”.
They’re gutting health care and food assistance for Californians. www.sfchronicle.com/politics/art...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-16 | S. Con. Res. 22 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (36-62) |
| 2025-09-16 | S.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-09-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2025-09-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2025-09-15 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Resolution S.Res. 377 | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Decision of the Chair S.Res. 377 | YES | YES | ✓ | Decision of Chair Not Sustained (45-53) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider S.Res. 377 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-10 | S. 2296 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-09-09 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-09-09 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-09-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-43) |
| 2025-09-04 | S. 2296 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-09-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-09-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-09-02 | S. 2296 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (71-23) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | — | — | Nomination Confirmed (72-22) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-35) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-42) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (78-17) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-19) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-41) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Amendment Agreed to (81-15) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (21-75) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (15-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.