Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island
Jack Reed
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes34%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 188 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The ‘Virgin Islands Carve Out’ is example 101 of how the Trump-Republican ‘Big Ugly’ tax bill is a giveaway to the ultra-wealthy. Trump is taking away people’s health care in order to give billionaires and corporations a bigger tax windfall to live it up in the Caribbean.
To all the dads out there: thank you for teaching us, loving us, & being there for us no matter what! Happy Father’s Day!
A little rain can’t stop the parade here at Gaspee Days! For 60 years, RIers have gathered along Narragansett Parkway to honor RI’s critical role in the lead up to the American Revolution & our historic commitment to freedom & liberty.
For 250 years, the U.S. Army has protected our nation’s freedom. Today is about the brave men & women who’ve worn the Army uniform and stood posts for liberty across the globe. Wishing a very happy 250th birthday to the U.S. Army.
248 years ago, the Second Continental Congress approved our first nat’l flag.
Today, we honor what the Stars & Stripes mean to us & reflect on the American values of freedom, equality and democracy & the continued struggle for a more perfect Union.
Celebrating community & the arts here at River Island Art Park to help kick off Woonsocket’s 2025 free summer concert series! Proud to deliver $450k in federal funds to help fix up the stage and make this a special community space for years & concerts to come.
I strongly condemn the Trump Administration’s misconduct and abuse of authority. The assault on @padilla.senate.gov was an assault on our Constitutional principles.
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING NEWS: CBO says after 10 years, Trump’s reconciliation bill gives 81% of total benefits to the richest 1/10th, while lower 40% of Americans will pay MORE. 🚨🚨🚨
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
HEGSETH: The mission in Los Angeles is about maintaining law and order
REED: Excuse me. Law and order is a civil function under the Constitution of the United States
Exeter Job Corps is a special place. When Trump Admin announced its plan to shutter these centers across the U.S. & barred me from visiting the Exeter center I helped open, I rallied w/ students & staff outside its gates to #SaveJobCorps.
I won’t let Trump slam the door to opportunity.
Health Insurance Saves Lives: People with health insurance get better health outcomes than those lacking coverage.
The Republican bill eliminates health insurance for millions of Americans and denies them preventive medical care in order to give bigger tax $$$ to the ultra-wealthy.
First Rule of Emergency Preparedness: Plan Ahead.
Trump’s Emergency Preparedness Plan: 🤷♂️
Trump must nominate an experienced FEMA Admin to restore confidence in the agency & ensure our communities can safely prepare for & respond to disasters.
RFK Jr. has said that he isn’t a reliable source for medical advice. Instead, we should listen to the experts. Like the researchers & scientists sounding the alarm at NIH.
Trump Admin’s policies are bad for public health.
Cutting Pell Grants will prevent more Americans from going to college.
Suppressing academic freedom will force U.S. researchers to fall behind.
The Trump Admin's attack on higher education is bad for students & bad for our economy.
OUTRAGEOUS: 6 SCOTUS justices & Trump Admin just blew away your privacy rights & data protection. DOGE may now access sensitive Social Security data, transfer it to external systems, & use it to reward their allies, punish critics, or enrich themselves.
www.npr.org/2025/06/06/n...
Sure, Elon v. Trump is entertaining. But you know what’s actually important?
Trump okaying Medicare cuts to pay for the Big, Beautiful Bill’s billionaire tax cuts.
www.politico.com/news/2025/06...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18