Since Trump is busy unilaterally renaming bodies of water down south, thought we’d get started up in New England.
How’s this?
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island
Jack Reed
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes34%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 188 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Trump Admin has put U.S. veterans’ personal data & health records at risk. I’m urging VA Secretary to immediately revoke Elon Musk’s access to veterans’ sensitive information & delete any and all private records downloaded by Musk’s coders.
Trump says the yolk’s on you: He pledged action to lower egg prices on day 1, but failed to follow through. His failures have actually caused egg prices to spike 15% in just 2 weeks. Tell Trump: It’s past time to crack down on anti-competitive price gouging!
Mr. Vought’s record of lawlessness & role as an author of Project 2025 make him a dangerous pick for OMB Director.
Joined @SenateDems in holding the Senate floor to expose his history of illegal actions & hazards of having him at the helm of this important gov’t office.
youtube.com/shorts/6CrQW...
This is disturbingly negligent. Our nation’s intelligence professionals are recruited by meticulous standards, and young officers make sacrifices that are unthinkable to most Americans. To recklessly risk their safety is unconscionable, and a gift to our adversaries.
www.nytimes.com/2025/02/05/u...
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
The "Deferred Resignation" offer from OPM to federal employees is deceptive, undermines vital services for Americans, & would raise costs for taxpayers.
I joined @murray.senate.gov, @reed.senate.gov, and @delauro.house.gov with important questions about the legal basis of this “buyout."
Tomorrow I’m taking to the floor in opposition to the nomination of Russell Vought. An instigator of #Project2025 who failed as OMB Director before should not oversee America’s budget.
Your privacy matters, especially when it comes to you & your family’s Social Security benefits & info, but the Trump Admin has apparently given a crew of unknown, unvetted, unaccountable coders full access to personal data of 70 million Social Security beneficiaries.
That’s wrong & dangerous.
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
“This is an administration that does not follow the law,” Democratic U.S. Sen. Jack Reed said Monday. He added, “It’s not just disruption. It’s lawlessness.”
Story by @tednesi.bsky.social: ⤵️
I want answers about the Trump Administration granting unprecedented & dangerous outsider access to the highly sensitive Treasury system that holds the personal info of millions of Americans & distributes funding for critical gov’t functions.
This chaos, abuse of power, & lawlessness must end.
Joined RI teachers, firefighters, public servants, & labor leaders to push the Trump Administration on swift implementation of the Social Security Fairness Act & ensure those who dedicated their lives to serving our communities get the benefits they earned.
This Black History Month we reflect on and celebrate the countless and profound achievements and contributions of Black Americans to Rhode Island and our nation.
Check out some greats ways to get involved & get inspired:
www.providencejournal.com/story/news/l...
I’m focused on bringing prices down.
Trump’s tariffs & economic policies – a de-facto ‘Trump Tax’ on American consumers – are likely to make things like groceries more expensive.
President Trump should take a smarter, more balanced approach to our economy that works for American families.
Sharing stories of hope, perseverance, joy, & community at the iconic 49th Annual Meeting Street Telethon.
Thanks to all the callers who rang me up while I helped phone bank & offered up support for this terrific organization.
Proud to help welcome the new Adjutant General of the Rhode Island National Guard, Brigadier General Andrew Chevalier and offer our gratitude for the service of former TAG, Major General Christopher Callahan.
The federal gov’t should work for YOU, not needlessly lock you out & deny you services.
I’ll keep pushing to ensure Trump’s disruptive federal funding freeze is truly rescinded.
www.youtube.com/shorts/CWjSS...
RI federal workers are right to be wary of Trump’s unauthorized ‘Deferred Resignation’ scheme.
It sounds like a trap.
Administrations routinely change every four years, but the Constitution & responsibilities of civil servants remains steadfast.
Will Trump’s federal grant freeze lower prices? No.
Will it strengthen our economy? No.
Will it waste U.S. taxpayers’ dollars & cause widespread confusion? It already has.
www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...
This freeze stems from either gross incompetence or an unprecedented power grab.
Either way, it puts key federal responsibilities on the chopping block, including: public safety, education, health care & Medicaid, veterans care, infrastructure, housing, national security & more.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-44) |
| 2025-05-21 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-52) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (46-52) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S. 1582 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31) |
| 2025-05-19 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-19 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-05-15 | S. Res. 195 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-05-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.