Jacky Rosen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Nevada
Born
August 2, 1957
Age 68
Phone
(202) 224-6244
Office
713 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada

Jacky Rosen

Jacklyn Sheryl Rosen is an American politician serving as the junior United States senator from Nevada since 2019. A member of the Democratic Party, she was the U.S. representative for Nevada's 3rd congressional district from 2017 to 2019.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 782
Yes37%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align89%
Cross-party11%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jacky Rosen headshot
Jacky Rosen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Jacky's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 59 sponsored · 213 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Nevada is a world-class destination with so much to offer, but fewer travelers are visiting this year amidst the chaos caused by the Trump Admin’s cost-hiking actions. Donald Trump’s reckless policies are bad for Nevada’s economy & businesses.
The NATO alliance is vital to the security of the United States and our allies. Donald Trump has no power to unilaterally withdraw from NATO without approval from Congress. Period.
We delivered a bipartisan message: America stands with the people of Taiwan, and we remain more committed than ever to helping Taiwan defend its democracy and maintain a free and open Indo-Pacific.
Donald Trump’s tariffs have taken a toll on small businesses as they struggle to keep their doors open and plan for the future. Small businesses in Nevada are being hurt by this unpredictability, and I will not stop fighting to exempt them from the president's cost-raising tariffs.
Gas prices are soaring and Nevadans are experiencing some of the highest gas prices in the nation. Hardworking Nevada families were already struggling to get by because of climbing grocery and health care costs. The Trump Admin is unfocused, and they're not making life more affordable for you.
There’s no such thing as “birthright citizenship for illegal aliens.” The U.S. Constitution is abundantly clear that if you are born in the United States, you are a citizen. Trying to take away citizenship from Americans is not only extreme, but also unconstitutional.
Harry Reid International Airport is a critical gateway to Las Vegas, welcoming millions of visitors every year. I’m proud to announce $9 million in federal funding that will support our airport through gate renovations and lay the groundwork for potential expansion.
Donald Trump wants to gut funding for programs that help Americans afford their groceries, home electricity bills, and health care. Families are desperate for some relief and Trump doesn’t care at all.
I’m demanding Secretary Kennedy thoroughly assess the economic impacts of these cruel health care cuts so Congress has a clear picture of the health care crisis Washington Republicans have ignored and made worse.
The Trump Admin and Congressional Republicans’ devastating cuts to Medicaid and the expiration of the ACA enhanced premium tax credits are forcing people to sacrifice their health just so they can afford rent and groceries.
The United States’ support for the Tibetan people is unwavering. We must do more to push back against the PRC's malign influence by advancing efforts to safeguard Tibetans' human rights and democratic freedoms, no matter where they reside.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
782 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESNOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16