For these reasons, I joined colleagues on both sides of the aisle to pass a bipartisan War Powers Resolution in the Senate and prohibit Donald Trump from carrying out additional strikes in Venezuela without the input of Congress.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada
Jacky Rosen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes36%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align89%
Cross-party11%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jacky Rosen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Jacky's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 59 sponsored · 210 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
They also jeopardize the safety of our brave servicemembers, a heavy decision that cannot be made without the input of the American people through their representatives in Congress.
...risks destabilizing the region, dragging us into additional military conflicts, and increasing the amount of immigrants seeking refuge at our border.
Nicolas Maduro was an illegitimate and brutal dictator, and I shed no tears for him finally facing accountability. But the Trump Admin's illegal operation and attempt at regime change merely props up Maduro’s handpicked authoritarian successor...
The Constitution is clear: only Congress has the power to declare war and authorize the use of military force in other nations. 🧵
I am deeply troubled and saddened to hear that ICE shot and killed a U.S. citizen earlier today.
We know the Trump Admin is all too comfortable lying to Americans, which is why we need more details and a full, independent investigation into what happened instead of taking their word for it.
Don’t let the Donald Trump gaslight you—January 6th was a violent insurrection and a horrific day for the United States.
We cannot let him rewrite history and dishonor the law enforcement officers who put their lives on the line to protect our democracy that day.
Auschwitz survivor and stepsister of Anne Frank, Eva Schloss, was a symbol of strength and resilience and an incredible educator on a history the world must never forget.
May her memory be a blessing.
Five years ago today, Trump sent violent insurrectionists to attack the U.S. Capitol.
Law & order won that day thanks to law enforcement, and many rioters were convicted.
Shamefully, Trump made it a priority last year to pardon these criminals, including those who assaulted police officers.
Millions of Americans are struggling to afford healthcare and groceries while Donald Trump is focused on costly regime change operations.
What happened to lowering costs for American families? Trump thinks that’s a “Democrat hoax.”
www.cnn.com/2026/01/05/w...
Happy New Year, Nevada! Wishing every Nevadan in every corner of our state a happy and healthy 2026.
I was proud to help pass the law to allow Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices. Starting in 2026, Medicare recipients will pay LESS in out-of-pocket costs for many lifesaving medications.
I’ll keep working to lower prescription drug prices for Medicare recipients & all Nevadans.
Wishing families across Nevada a very Merry Christmas! May this day be filled with love, joy, and lots of time with family and loved ones.
From the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest to the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol, Silver Belle is a shining symbol of Nevada’s natural beauty and resilience, and we’re honored to have our state represented here in the nation’s capital for the first time.
While Nevada families worry about how they’ll afford their health insurance and groceries, Trump is focused on building his $400 million White House ballroom and slapping his name up on the Kennedy Center.
A new study estimates Trump’s tariffs have already cost American families over $1,000 extra on average.
This is essentially an additional tax on the things you purchase – which could mean paying over $2,000 extra next year.
We have to repeal these tariffs and give Nevadans some breathing room.
Trump’s FCC Chair investigated CBS for editing an interview of VP Harris.
But Fox did the same thing in an interview with Trump to make his answer about releasing the Epstein files look good – in the middle of a presidential campaign.
Why won’t Brendan Carr hold Fox to the same standard as CBS?
Only a billionaire who hasn’t stepped foot in a grocery store in years would say affordability is a hoax.
And then give himself an “A+++++” on the economy.
Trump is lying about the economy and Nevadans can feel it.
It was wonderful to celebrate the first night of Hanukkah with a menorah lighting at the Fremont Street Experience in downtown Las Vegas!
To all those celebrating, I hope your holiday is filled with love and light.
I’m leading the push to overturn a rule that could cause Nevadans to lose their work permits because of processing delays. This chaos will hurt Nevada’s economy and harm immigrant families.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-19 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-02-18 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-28) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.