Charles E. Schumer headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New York
Born
November 23, 1950
Age 75
Phone
(202) 224-6542
Office
322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York

Charles E. Schumer

Voting Record — 890
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Charles E. Schumer headshot
Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 32 sponsored · 176 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Nothing says 'America First' like Air Force One, brought to you by Qatar. It’s not just bribery, it’s premium foreign influence with extra legroom.
A headline from ABC News reads: “Trump administration poised to accept ‘palace in the sky’ as a gift for Trump from Qatar: Sources”
There was a new outage at Newark airport this morning—Enough. Secretary Duffy needs to put Newark first in line to receive critically-needed fixes and tech so Air Traffic Control can function safely like it should. Newark cannot wait.
Trump and DOGE are trying to gut FEMA. They just fired their own acting administrator who dared to challenge them even once. And installed a new one whose plans will risk lives and hurt communities when they need help the most.
I joined Chinatown community members & leaders today whose livelihoods depend on Medicaid Republicans want to take an axe to Medicaid: It will hammer our hospitals Our nursing homes will be decimated People will lose their jobs And millions of New Yorkers will lose health care
Trump's firing 92% of staff at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. They’re a critical agency that helps factory workers, farmers, firefighters, and healthcare workers prevent work-related injury, illness, and death. It’s unconscionable, dangerous, and hurts working people.
I’m standing with @warren.senate.gov to lead Democrats in helping the lawsuit against Trump’s attempts to dismantle the CFPB. Trump’s entire slash and burn agenda is geared toward making life better for billionaires and big banks and worse for working families.
1000 measles cases. It’s no coincidence that this has happened after DOGE cancelled $11 billion that went to state and local public health departments. It’s no coincidence that this has happened after the CDC fired infectious disease experts. Trump and RFK Jr. must act to stop measles now.
We just learned that there was ANOTHER outage with the FAA in Newark this morning.   Enough.   Trump needs to get it together now and stop risking safety so DOGE can play government.
“See you in court”

That's what the fired members of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission are telling Trump. 
Trump doesn't have the power to fire members of USCPSC. 
Trump's just mad because we've worked with USCPSC to stop poorly-made lithium-ion batteries from continuing to hurt people.
A post from Alex Hoehn-Saric reads: "President Trump is attempting to illegally remove me from the CPSC. See my statement."
I'm with @momsrising.org fighting back against the harmful Republican plans to cut to health care, child care, and Social Security. We won't stop working to give our children everything they need to become happy, strong, and prosperous members of society.
Trump’s supposed trade deal with the UK isn’t a triumph of strategy—it’s a product of chaos Who knows if he’ll actually stick with the “deal” or what he’ll say next He’s constantly giving everyone whiplash His cabinet's already lowering expectations It's the Trump credo: government by chaos
It is equal parts exciting and wonderful that Cardinal Robert Prevost, an American, has been chosen to be the next Pope. I extend well wishes to our fellow Catholic Americans and Catholics worldwide as they welcome the papacy of Leo XIV.
A headline from the AP reads: “Robert Prevost of the United States is named Pope Leo XIV”
Telling Americans that you want to axe their health care so that extremely rich people can pay less in taxes is a horrible message. But Republicans are working overtime to get it done. That is the definition of cruelty.
No matter which scheme for Medicaid cuts Republicans choose, it will result in millions being kicked off their health insurance. There's no way for Republicans to accomplish their goal of massive tax giveaways for the wealthy without devastating millions of Americans.
An image shows a post from Jake Sherman that reads: "BREAKING -- A new CBO analysis shows that several policies Republicans are considering for slashing Medicaid spending would lead to millions of people losing health insurance coverage. The analysis, requested by Democrats, says that per capita caps for the Medicaid expansion population would save $225 billion in federal spending and result in 1.5 million more uninsured people by 2034. Blocking provider taxes could save $668 billion and lead 3.9 million to lose coverage, per CBO. Read CBO's letter to Democrats here: http://pbwl.news/yhw"
Trump’s tariffs are a painful tax eating away at Americans' hard-earned money Americans deserve to know who's picking their pockets My bill with Rep. Raskin will make clear that Trump's promise to lower costs on day 1 was fiction—all for a tariff policy that's sending our economy into a tailspin
Donald Trump is taxing the American people with his tariffs, and they have a right to know exactly how much. I'm introducing legislation with @raskin.house.gov to require retailers to show consumers precisely how much the tariffs are increasing the prices of their products.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 18 / 18