Charles E. Schumer headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New York
Born
November 23, 1950
Age 75
Phone
(202) 224-6542
Office
322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York

Charles E. Schumer

Charles Ellis Schumer is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New York, a seat he has held since 1999. A member of the Democratic Party, he has led the Senate Democratic Caucus since 2017 and served as Senate Majority Leader from 2021 to 2025. He has served two stints as Senate minority leader, from 2017 to 2021 and since 2025. He became New York's senior senator in 2001, upon Daniel Patrick Moynihan's retirement. Elected to a fifth term in 2022, Schumer surpassed Moynihan and Jacob K. Javits as the longest-serving U.S. senator from New York. He is the dean of New York's congressional delegation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 789
Yes27%
No73%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Charles E. Schumer headshot
Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 156 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

THE TRUTH COMES OUT Trump’s White House says the veterans his admin fired were perhaps “not fit” for their jobs. An obscene way to talk about America’s veterans. They put their lives on the line for us. We owe them a debt we can never repay. Dems are fighting for them. Trump is mocking them.
I'm welcoming Orna Neutra and Ruby Chen to the Capitol. Orna’s and Ruby’s sons, Omer Neutra and Itay Chen, were viciously murdered by Hamas on October 7 and Hamas still holds their bodies hostage today. I will keep fighting by their side to bring every single hostage home urgently.
—Tiffany, who was fired from her job at the USDA in Syracuse —Jessica and Ana, two cancer survivors who depend on Medicaid to live Democrats are fighting for you.
—Emma, a 12-year-old with a rare genetic disease who has treated her condition thanks to NIH-funded research —Alissa, a disabled Army vet, one of the nearly 2,500 VA employees fired by DOGE
“When I win, I will immediately bring prices down starting on day one.” That’s what Trump promised. But you won’t you hear him say that tonight. Inflation has gone up Energy prices are up Egg prices are up 15% Housing costs are up And so much more Democrats will keep fighting for you.
Trump's tariffs on Canada and Mexico mean Americans families could see $2,000 more in expenses every year. Trump is starting a trade war with our closest trade partners. And all so he can cut taxes for his billionaires' club. Democrats will not stop fighting for families.
Trump won’t say a thing tonight about his broken promise to bring inflation down on DAY ONE. Trump won’t talk about how his policies are raising costs for American families. All to lower taxes for billionaires. Democrats are fighting for families.
Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and DOGE are trying to slash Americans’ Social Security. All to pay for tax breaks for their billionaires’ club. It’s outrageous. Democrats are fighting to stop it.
How embarrassing for them. Can’t wait to hear Trump’s “Chickens in every backyard” riff at tomorrow’s speech. This is not a solution. Trump’s cabinet is mocking you. Democrats are fighting to lower prices for you.
Trump’s Sec of Agriculture Brooke Rollins says the solution to high egg prices for Americans is to get some chickens and raise them in your backyard.
Every single Senate Democrat just voted against Linda McMahon's nomination as Education Secretary Americans believe in public education They don't want to see education funding slashed to give a tax break to Trump's billionaires' club Democrats will not stop fighting for our kids’ education
Trump and Musk brought their chainsaw to the pockets of over 70M people with the goal of slashing Social Security Their staff cuts will make it harder for Americans to get the benefits they're owed It will hurt our seniors, families, kids Democrats will fight tooth and nail to stop it
This is Dilletta. She’s from the Bronx. And you need to watch her heartbreaking story about how her son’s life is at risk from the cuts to Medicaid that Trump and the Republicans are trying to make to give tax cuts to their billionaires' club. Democrats won't stand for it.
If you can’t get the Social Security you earned because Trump's cutting Social Security staff—that’s a benefits cut If you can’t get answers to your questions or get an issue resolved because no one can take your call—that’s a benefits cut Dems are fighting for Social Security
In a little over one month—Trump, Musk, and Republicans have set in motion the greatest transfer of wealth in favor of billionaires we have seen in modern times. Nothing Trump says during his address tomorrow will change that fact. Democrats are fighting for you.
Trump is pillaging your wallets and wrecking your 401k with his misguided tariffs to give tax cuts to his billionaires’ club. Democrats will not stop fighting for you, for our economy, for your retirement.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16