Trump voted by mail this year.
He doesn’t want you to be able to do the same.
Why?
Because he knows his party is going to lose.
This unconstitutional executive order will not stand up in court. And it will not stop the accountability that is coming.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|California
Adam B. Schiff
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 782
Yes30%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align93%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Adam B. Schiff
U.S. SenatorDemocratCalifornia
SoupScore
Adam B.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 52 sponsored · 296 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Bay Bridge dazzles again with brilliant new lights.
Glad the bridge is once again illuminated for all to see, and thank you to all those who brought this thrilling display back to the skyline.
www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/b...
I'm launching an inquiry with @padilla.senate.gov on the alarming actions by ICE at SFO.
We must know what immigration data TSA is sharing with ICE & why.
The last thing we need are more scenes like the one we witnessed last week.
ICE agents shouldn't be at our airports.
A war you don't want, paid for by (more) cuts to your health care.
www.axios.com/2026/03/30/g...
The prediction markets industry can't be left alone to self-police.
We need strong rules to protect against elected officials exploiting insider information to profit on these markets.
I'm joining @slotkin.senate.gov on a bipartisan bill to crack down on this.
What's one sentence voters should remember about our country under Trump?
Your cost of living is way too high, because he doesn't give a rat's ass about you.
Rather than enforce the law, the CFTC Chair is greenlighting sports betting in prediction markets — even though it should be up to the states to decide.
Sen. Curtis and I have a new bipartisan bill to ban these illegal contracts & eliminate this backdoor.
Five years ago, we witnessed the immense heroism of Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police, and other law enforcement officers who protected Congress on January 6.
This week, we gathered to honor their contributions and bravery with a new tribute in the Capitol Building.
Trump says he needs another $200,000,000,000 for his war.
Not for health care. Not for housing. Not for education.
Instead, he's asking every family to chip in $1,400 to keep bombing Iran.
San Jose says: No Kings. Not now. Not ever.
Thank you to the millions of people standing up for the spirit of our democracy.
Trump installed former chemical industry insiders to run the EPA’s chemical & pesticide oversight.
Does that surprise you?
I’m working with @merkley.senate.gov to pressure the chemical industry to recuse themselves from decisions that affect their old companies.
Our health may depend on it.
Late last night, the Senate finally passed legislation funding TSA, FEMA, and other critical DHS components.
Here's where we go from here.
Trump’s cabinet thinks Venezuela is going to help us lower gas prices.
But then, they also think the repressive regime there is going to erect a statue to Trump.
And as you can see — that’s all he cares about.
5 years ago, our law enforcement officers bravely defended our democracy from attack.
I'm joining my fellow members of the Jan 6th Committee and Congressional leaders to recognize their service and celebrate the long overdue installation of a recognition of their honor.
youtube.com/live/WTnLSSc...
As with everything with Donald Trump, it always comes down to money.
His money.
And that's the only real priority he has, even when it's our national security at stake.
www.ms.now/news/trump-c...
Trump insiders may be getting richer.
While American families get poorer.
This insider trading must be stopped.
The White House must release its transaction reports.
Now.
www.cnbc.com/2026/03/23/v...
The only thing standing between you and your gate...
Or TSA agents and their paychecks...
Trump and Republicans in Congress.
Hoping they will now agree to fund TSA.
ASAP
Tonight, I voted NO on Trump’s new DHS Secretary.
Here's why:
youtu.be/0xvjSp7pxoY?...
ICE is already at our airports.
Bringing heartbreaking scenes like this to an already chaotic environment.
And now Tom Homan and Donald Trump want them at every airport across America.
Today marks 16 years of the Affordable Care Act — a landmark expansion of health care for millions of Americans.
Since then, Republicans and Trump have waged war on health care.
Their Big Ugly Bill jacked up costs and will kick millions off of their plans.
Indeed, it already has.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History782 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
782 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 16 / 16