When President Trump threatens Canada with higher tariffs, it causes real economic harm for my constituents. His rhetoric has led to a sharp drop in Canadian tourism to our state, which takes money right out of the pockets of small business owners across NH.
newhampshirebulletin.com/2026/02/09/s...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
One of the most rewarding parts of my job is bringing home federal funds to support communities across NH. Recently, I had the pleasure of letting Reach for the Top Therapy in Dover know that we had secured a $181,000 grant so they can expand therapy services to children in need.
When adversaries, like China, have control over America's critical mineral supply, it risks our national security and economic independence.
My SECURE Minerals Act would help us reverse course by supporting domestic supply chains for these key resources.
www.eenews.net/articles/us-...
Let’s get the facts straight: tariffs are taxes paid by Americans, not foreign countries.
Americans are paying 95% of the costs of President Trump's tariffs. No matter who the President blames, his policies are leading to higher costs and higher taxes for everyday families.
Last year, Vice President Vance alienated our European friends and allies with his speech at the @munsecconf.bsky.social. But this year, I led a bipartisan delegation to Munich to show that Congress' commitment to our collective security as transatlantic allies remains ironclad.
Senator Tillis and I told @npr.org about the bipartisan support for NATO not just in Congress, but among Americans.
8 years ago, a shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School took the lives of 17 students and staff. Today, we honor their lives and remember all who were affected by this horrific event.
We must pursue commonsense gun reform to prevent these tragedies.
Affordability concerns aren’t a “hoax,” and American communities are feeling the effects of President Trump’s tariffs in all aspects of their lives—from higher prices to less jobs.
www.wsj.com/economy/u-s-...
There's a reason why support for NATO is at its highest point in history in the United States among voters.
Because voters are looking at the chaos and conflict in the world and they understand that NATO helps make us safe.
It’s great to see this new expansion at Franklin Pierce to help Granite Staters confront shrinking access to health care. I’m proud to have secured federal funding for this project that will strengthen our rural health systems across the state.
www.unionleader.com/news/busines...
The President can say what he wants, but Congress is a separate branch of government. On a bipartisan basis, I believe members of Congress overwhelmingly understand how important the EU, NATO and our allies and partners around the world are to America's national security.
Overdose reversal agents like Naloxone save lives.
To help more veterans who are struggling with substance use disorder, I introduced legislation that would allow veterans and their caregivers to more easily get these lifesaving treatments at no cost at their local VA clinics.
With the expiration of the ACA enhanced premium tax credits, Americans are seeing their premiums skyrocket—some by thousands of dollars.
Health care costs are eating into the incomes of everyday Americans.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/30/u...
We now know that in President Trump's first year, job growth stalled, adding the fewest jobs since 2020—a recession year. Americans are anxious about the job market and high costs. It's time President Trump focuses on such concerns, not brush them off as a "hoax."
www.nbcnews.com/business/eco...
It was a pleasure to join my friend, former Ambassador Swett, to express support for our Danish allies and discuss the future of NATO—which remains critical to our national security.
Thank you to the World Affairs Council of New Hampshire for hosting such an important conversation.
Supporting America’s domestic critical minerals supply chain is key for our national security and economic security.
My bill does just that, while boosting New Hampshire’s economy, home to leading rare earth refining company Phoenix Tailings.
As I warned in a letter to Secretary Bessent last year, reckless cuts at the IRS have left it woefully unprepared this tax season.
Unfortunately, it’s taxpayers who will bear the brunt of the cuts, with refund delays and error rates expected to surge.
www.govexec.com/management/2...
Continued investigation and treatment for victims of anomalous health incidents is critical to the health of our national security personnel.
@deptofwar.bsky.social must do right by these victims.
www.cbsnews.com/news/senator...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-16 | S. Con. Res. 22 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (36-62) |
| 2025-09-16 | S.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-09-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2025-09-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2025-09-15 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Resolution S.Res. 377 | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Decision of the Chair S.Res. 377 | YES | YES | ✓ | Decision of Chair Not Sustained (45-53) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider S.Res. 377 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-10 | S. 2296 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-09-09 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-09-09 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-09-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-43) |
| 2025-09-04 | S. 2296 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-09-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-09-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-09-02 | S. 2296 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (71-23) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | — | — | Nomination Confirmed (72-22) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-35) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (52-42) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (78-17) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-19) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-41) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (81-15) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (21-75) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (15-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.