With DHS moving to open secretive facilities across the country and refusing to answer our questions, locals are right to be concerned.
In response, I'm introducing a new bill to strengthen local oversight over proposed ICE facilities.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 843
Yes43%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 88 sponsored · 299 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
From March-November last year, Granite Staters paid upwards of $500 million in tariffs. With grocery bills rising, health care premiums spiking and an ill-advised trade war, Americans are rightly anxious about the administration's handling of the economy.
www.cnbc.com/2026/02/11/i...
It’s great to see Granite State athletes, including our UNH and Dartmouth competitors, represented at this year’s Winter Olympics.
A special congratulations to Salem’s Caroline Harvey for taking home gold and tournament MVP with the U.S. Women's Hockey Team.
You all make NH proud!
Caregivers are vital to our communities in New Hampshire, providing essential health care services to patients and creating peace of mind for their families.
On National Caregivers Day, we extend our appreciation for all they do to help others.
Today marks a major step towards providing relief to Americans who have been forced to pay higher prices or lost sales due to the President’s illegal, reckless trade war.
My full statement on today's Supreme Court ruling:
Today marks the annual Day of Remembrance of Japanese American Incarceration.
More than 120,000 Japanese Americans were interned during World War II, and today we should work to ensure that injustices like these never occur again.
The President’s economic plan has cut health care access and food assistance for our nation's most vulnerable—all to pay for tax breaks for the wealthy.
The result: struggling families and adding $4.7 trillion to the national debt by 2035.
www.reuters.com/business/us-...
The Granite State was already facing a shortage of affordable housing, and under the Trump Administration, we’ve only seen this worsen. I remain committed to working toward solutions that will increase access and reduce the cost of housing in our state.
www.laconiadailysun.com/news/state/n...
When President Trump threatens Canada with higher tariffs, it causes real economic harm for my constituents. His rhetoric has led to a sharp drop in Canadian tourism to our state, which takes money right out of the pockets of small business owners across NH.
newhampshirebulletin.com/2026/02/09/s...
One of the most rewarding parts of my job is bringing home federal funds to support communities across NH. Recently, I had the pleasure of letting Reach for the Top Therapy in Dover know that we had secured a $181,000 grant so they can expand therapy services to children in need.
When adversaries, like China, have control over America's critical mineral supply, it risks our national security and economic independence.
My SECURE Minerals Act would help us reverse course by supporting domestic supply chains for these key resources.
www.eenews.net/articles/us-...
Let’s get the facts straight: tariffs are taxes paid by Americans, not foreign countries.
Americans are paying 95% of the costs of President Trump's tariffs. No matter who the President blames, his policies are leading to higher costs and higher taxes for everyday families.
Last year, Vice President Vance alienated our European friends and allies with his speech at the @munsecconf.bsky.social. But this year, I led a bipartisan delegation to Munich to show that Congress' commitment to our collective security as transatlantic allies remains ironclad.
Senator Tillis and I told @npr.org about the bipartisan support for NATO not just in Congress, but among Americans.
8 years ago, a shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School took the lives of 17 students and staff. Today, we honor their lives and remember all who were affected by this horrific event.
We must pursue commonsense gun reform to prevent these tragedies.
Affordability concerns aren’t a “hoax,” and American communities are feeling the effects of President Trump’s tariffs in all aspects of their lives—from higher prices to less jobs.
www.wsj.com/economy/u-s-...
There's a reason why support for NATO is at its highest point in history in the United States among voters.
Because voters are looking at the chaos and conflict in the world and they understand that NATO helps make us safe.
It’s great to see this new expansion at Franklin Pierce to help Granite Staters confront shrinking access to health care. I’m proud to have secured federal funding for this project that will strengthen our rural health systems across the state.
www.unionleader.com/news/busines...
The President can say what he wants, but Congress is a separate branch of government. On a bipartisan basis, I believe members of Congress overwhelmingly understand how important the EU, NATO and our allies and partners around the world are to America's national security.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History843 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
843 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2026-06-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-30) |
| 2026-06-22 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (85-5) |
| 2026-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (48-39) |
| 2026-06-18 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-17 | S. Res. 616 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (55-39) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41) |
| 2026-06-16 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (87-8) |
| 2026-06-16 | S.J. Res. 172 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 172 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-48) |
| 2026-06-16 | S.J. Res. 190 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-48) |
| 2026-06-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-43) |
| 2026-06-11 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-43) |
| 2026-06-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-06-10 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2026-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (50-44) |
| 2026-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2026-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-06-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Budgetary Discipline Re: Lee Amdt. No. 5804) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (50-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-51) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 1318 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (52-47) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schiff Amdt. No. 5740) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 5632) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (53-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Cassidy Amdt. No. 5812) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Coons Amdt. No. 5457) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Durbin Amdt. No. 5806) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Booker Amdt. No. 5803) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 5485) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5451) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion (Warnock Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-52) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kim Amdt. No. 5545) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 5501) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (51-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Graham Amdt. No. 5779) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 5556) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hassan Amdt. No. 5535) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion (Ossoff Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 5514) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 5512) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (53-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Tillis Amdt. No. 5452) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (15-84) |
| 2026-06-04 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion (Schumer motion to commit S.2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-06-03 | S. 2 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2026-06-03 | S.J. Res. 188 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-53) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 17Next →