Jeanne Shaheen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Hampshire
Born
January 28, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-2841
Office
506 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire

Jeanne Shaheen

Voting Record — 890
Yes42%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jeanne Shaheen headshot
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 97 sponsored · 327 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

It was great to visit Brothers Cortado in Concord—and to try their refreshing iced tea! The small business is facing higher prices due to President Trump's tariffs on coffee bean imports. This administration's trade war is raising the cost of everything, including your morning brew.
For 90 years, Americans have relied on Social Security to anchor their retirement planning. While the Trump administration continues to place social security under attack, I'll never stop fighting to protect it for today's older adults and future generations to come.
The Mount Washington Observatory is a world-class research institution situated atop our most iconic peak. I was glad to visit the observatory to see firsthand the snowcat they acquired with federal funding I fought for. I even had the honor of being the first one to test it out!
The Big Beautiful Betrayal is threatening the survival of hospitals in the most rural parts of NH. I led a roundtable at MaineHealth Memorial Hospital in North Conway to discuss how we can support affordable care in the North Country despite devastating federal health care cuts.
The new bipartisan bill I’m leading with Senators Maggie Hassan, Susan Collins and Angus King—the Protecting Public Naval Shipyards Act—would codify the hiring freeze exemption we secured for the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard workforce. Let’s get this done. www.fosters.com/story/news/l...
It's great to see federal funding headed to the Manchester VA to make much-needed repairs and infrastructure and technology updates. These critical improvements will help keep the facility up and running for the Granite State veterans who rely on the VA for health care. news.va.gov/press-room/v...
For Granite Staters, basic necessities—housing, food, electricity and health care—are too expensive. We need to advance policies that lower costs, like investing in clean energy and extending the ACA Enhanced Premium Tax Credits, but President Trump is focused on doing the opposite.
President Trump's misguided move to impose sweeping tariffs on more than 90 countries will raise prices on everyday goods like food, clothing and housing, at a time when many families are already struggling with high costs. My full statement ⬇️
With insurers now set to hike premiums in every state across this country, and with Republican cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act becoming law last month, it is clear now more than ever that Congress must prioritize lowering health care costs before it’s too late.
ACA Marketplace Plans nationally are seeking a median 18% premium increase for 2026. For proposed rate changes by state and insurer, read the analysis: on.kff.org/4m3EwQy
KFF bar chart showing the distribution of proposed 2026 rate increases among 312 ACA Marketplace insurers in 50 states and D.C. The chart shows that the median proposed increase is about 18%.
The impacts of President Trump’s “Big Beautiful Betrayal” on hunger are going to be far-reaching. While millions of Americans lose access to food assistance, grocery stores in rural areas could be forced to shut their doors, imperiling access to food for entire communities.
If ACA premium tax credits expire, it would be a disaster for working families who are already being squeezed by high prices. Health coverage costs would skyrocket for 20 million Americans, and millions more would lose coverage altogether. We must act before it's too late.
I’m leading a new bipartisan bill to exempt America’s four public shipyards, like Portsmouth, from recent hiring freezes and mass layoffs. Our shipyard workforce is an essential part of our national defense – they should have never been subjected to such chaos and uncertainty.
Let's be clear: President Trump's "trade deals" are not a win for America. Tariffs—taxes paid for by Americans—remain higher than they were at the start of this senseless trade war, and it will cost working families more than $2,000 a year as a result.
We should support domestic manufacturing, but the reality is that President Trump’s tariffs are doing the exact opposite. We’ve lost manufacturing jobs every month since he announced global tariffs in April, totaling 37,000 lost jobs in this critical sector.
Good news: The Senate unanimously passed my bipartisan resolution to designate Thursday, August 21 as National Fentanyl Prevention and Awareness Day. It's important that we continue to draw attention to this crisis as we work on solutions that will save lives.
Last night President Trump confirmed that Americans will be facing the highest tariffs since the Great Depression thanks to his reckless and chaotic trade war. Make no mistake: American workers and businesses are going to pay the price. www.shaheen.senate.gov/news/press/s...
Here’s the story of Trump’s economy as his tariffs begin to take effect: costs and inflation are up, job opportunities are down. President Trump promised to lower prices, but thanks to his policies it's becoming even more difficult for Americans to get by.
U.S. employment barely budged in July, while prior job gains were revised to be much weaker than initially thought. It's the first major indicator to point to danger ahead for the U.S. economy.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-30Motion (Motion to Waive Section 302(F) of the CBA Re: Amdt. No. 2414)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Blunt Rochester Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52)
2025-06-30Motion (Motion to Waive Section 302(F) of the CBA Re: Amdt. No. 2696)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Reed Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Lujan Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Motion (Schumer Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Decision of the Chair H.R. 1NONODecision of Chair Sustained (53-47)
2025-06-30H.R. 1 (119th)Decision of the Chair S.Amdt. 2360 to H.R. 1 (No short title on file)NONODecision of Chair Sustained (53-47)
2025-06-28H.R. 1 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2025-06-27S.J. Res. 59 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 59YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2025-06-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-25End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-06-25Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (56-40)
2025-06-24End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-06-24Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (61-35)
2025-06-23End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (58-33)
2025-06-18Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-18Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-18End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-46)
2025-06-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (68-30)
2025-06-17Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-17Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (57-40)
2025-06-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-06-17End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (46-39)
2025-06-16End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (44-33)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (67-30)
2025-06-12Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307)NONOMotion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Failed (45-52)
2025-06-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 54 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 53 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S. 1582 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-11End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-06-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-06-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-41)
2025-06-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (48-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 18Next →