PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Jeanne Shaheen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Hampshire
Born
January 28, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-2841
Office
506 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire

Jeanne Shaheen

Cynthia Jeanne Shaheen is an American politician and former educator serving since 2009 as the senior United States senator from New Hampshire. A member of the Democratic Party, she served from 1997 to 2003 as the 78th governor of New Hampshire. Shaheen is the first woman elected both governor and a U.S. senator, and was the first female governor of New Hampshire.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenatorShaheenFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Jeanne Shaheen headshot
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 24(source)
I do not have confidence that Senator Mullin has the willingness or vision to undertake urgently-needed reforms at the Department of Homeland Security to rebuild trust following Secretary Noem’s disastrous tenure. My full statement on tonight's vote:
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 23(source)
16 years ago, the Affordable Care Act was signed into law—giving tens of thousands of Granite Staters health insurance access. I'm proud of all the ACA accomplished, but the work isn’t done. We must keep fighting to lower health care costs and expand access to American families.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 22(source)
On World Water Day, we remember that clean drinking water is a priceless resource. With this Administration working to dismantle safeguards for clean water, we must protect the rivers, lakes and streams that supply our drinking water and provide treasured places for recreation.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 20(source)
Since March of last year, Americans have been forced to pay $166 billion in illegal tariff costs—with New Hampshire alone paying $510 million. The President's unlawful tariffs are costing my constituents their hard-earned dollars. This reckless trade policy must end now.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 20(source)
The Trump Administration's gutting of federal agencies has left Americans stranded in the Middle East and weakened our ability to defend against cyber threats. Worst of all: They fired the very FBI staff tasked with tracking threats from Iran. www.cnn.com/2026/03/10/p...
‘A shell of our former self’: How Trump and Musk’s spending cuts are hampering US government readiness amid the Iran war | CNN Politics
Government cuts under Trump’s second term weakened U.S. emergency, security, and foreign response capabilities, now under scrutiny amid Middle East conflict.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 20(source)
The Education Alliance of NH has for decades provided critical resources for Granite State students to help them excel. It is a travesty that President Trump’s reckless cuts have forced them to close. The President is choosing to leave New Hampshire students behind.
Nonprofit helping 5,000 students prep for higher ed closes its doors
A nonprofit providing access to college for more than 5,000 New Hampshire students has closed its doors after concluding it can’t survive Trump administration moves to cut $20 million in
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 20(source)
With historically high prices, affordable housing is out of reach for far too many Granite Staters. Earlier this week, I spoke with my constituent, Kerry, to hear her story and the difficulties she faced when searching for a new, affordable home in our state. Watch below ⬇️
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 19(source)
Members of the military put their lives on the line to keep our nation safe—they deserve access to the very best health care. The President and Congressional Republicans’ reckless cuts are jeopardizing health care access for thousands of servicemembers. That’s unacceptable.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 18(source)
Skipping meals, borrowing money, deferring critical medical procedures to keep up with rising health care costs—this is what the President's affordability crisis looks like for Americans. We must work toward solutions that will bring real relief to working families.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 17(source)
Last week, I had the privilege of meeting with the Professional Firefighters of New Hampshire and the Shipyard Professional Fire Fighters. These brave men and women are invaluable in our communities. Thank you for all that you do to keep the Granite State safe.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 17(source)
When it comes to Cuba, my constituents aren't asking for an incursion into yet another country. What I hear them saying is that they are worried about the high price of gas, of groceries, of housing and of child care. They want action to lower costs. Not another forever war.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 16(source)
From mass firings at the IRS to the cancelling of the Direct File program, the President is making it harder for the American taxpayer this season. I’m proud to have joined a bill that would save the Direct File program, which millions relied on to save time and money on their taxes.
Shaheen, Hassan Help Introduce Bill to Bring Back Direct File, Make Taxes Easier | U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire
**The Direct File Act would reverse the Trump Administration’s decision to cancel the successful and...
← Newer postsPosts page 7Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
772 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-04-29—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (83-14)
2025-04-29—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13)
2025-04-29—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (60-36)
2025-04-29—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36)
2025-04-29—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (59-39)
2025-04-29—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39)
2025-04-29—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (67-29)
2025-04-28—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27)
2025-04-11—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (60-25)
2025-04-11—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25)
2025-04-11—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (59-26)
2025-04-11—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25)
2025-04-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-46)
2025-04-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-10H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 20NONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (53-44)
2025-04-09H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42)
2025-04-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-04-09—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-04-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-04-09—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (60-37)
2025-04-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-04-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-04-08—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42)
2025-04-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-04-08—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-04-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-08—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (66-32)
2025-04-08—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32)
2025-04-08—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-04-07—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept House changesNONO✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05—Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (5-94)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-51)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 16Next →