PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Tina Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Minnesota
Born
1958
Age 68
Phone
(202) 224-5641
Office
720 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota

Tina Smith

Christine Elizabeth Smith is an American politician, retired Democratic political consultant, and former businesswoman serving as the junior United States senator from Minnesota since 2018. She is a member of the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party (DFL), an affiliate of the Democratic Party.

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 785
Yes24%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenTinaSmithFacebookInstagram
Tina Smith headshot
Tina Smith
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Tina's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 36 sponsored · 285 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 10(source)
Your platform suffers a massive cyberattack but sure, definitely take the time to “own the libs” instead of getting your own house in order. Makes sense. Very *efficient* use of your time, Elon.
Yashar Ali 🐘
@yasharali.bsky.social
Open post ↗
“You are a traitor.” An absurd and insulting thing to say to anyone who posts what Senator Kelly did. And even more insulting since he served as a U.S. Navy captain and a NASA astronaut. Kelly was a combat pilot and flew 39 combat missions during Operation Desert Storm in the Gulf War.
Alt-Text: A screenshot of a post on X (formerly Twitter) by Senator Mark Kelly (@SenMarkKelly) and a reply from Elon Musk (@elonmusk). Senator Mark Kelly’s post reads: “Just left Ukraine. What I saw proved to me we can’t give up on the Ukrainian people. Everyone wants this war to end, but any agreement has to protect Ukraine’s security and can’t be a giveaway to Putin. Let me tell you about my trip and why it’s important we stand with Ukraine.” The post includes a photograph of a rusted, damaged tank covered in graffiti, parked in a public square. People are walking around the area, and a man wearing a camouflage cap and a brown jacket stands next to the tank. In the background, there is a yellow building with a blue roof and a sign that says “Mariupol.” Elon Musk’s reply to the post says: “You are a traitor.”
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 6(source)
Trump During SOTU: We are going to build the healthiest and most vital communities anywhere in the world. Trump Earlier That Day: Doctors only have to save a pregnant woman’s life in *some* states.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 5(source)
YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE AIRLIFTED TO OTHER STATES TO OBTAIN HEALTH CARE THAT WILL SAVE YOUR LIFE!
Alice Miranda Ollstein
@alicemiranda.bsky.social
Open post ↗
BREAKING: Trump is dropping the EMTALA case it inherited from Biden — a battle with Idaho over patients' right to have an abortion in a medical emergency. An Idaho hospital warns women in crisis will once again be airlifted out of the state if courts don't act soon. www.politico.com/news/2025/03...
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 5(source)
Musk is shamelessly enriching his minions with the salaries of hard-working Americans. He claims to be fighting government waste? Nope. Disgraceful but unsurprising.
Article posted by My Perfect Union Titled: Some DOGE employees are earning six-figure taxpayer-funded a salaries from the federal agencies they are shutting down.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 4(source)
Trump doesn’t give a damn about us, he only cares about billing us for his tax breaks for the richest of the rich. Screwing Minnesotans by putting us in the middle of a trade war with our *ally* is beyond insanity.
@NewsWire_US: Ontario's 25% export tax on electricity will affect 1.5 million homes in Minnesota, Michigan and New York ⚠ ONTARIO TO ISSUE 25% EXPORT TAX ON ELECTRICITY TO U.S.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 3(source)
Musk and Trump should have to face the hardworking Park Rangers they sacked. I’m bringing Kate, who was unjustly fired from northern Minnesota’s Voyageurs National Park, to the State of the Union.
Kate Severson, a federal park ranger at Voyageurs National Park in Minnesota. Severson was one of the thousands of newly-hired federal workers to be abruptly fired Friday, February 14, 2025, as part of the Trump administrations push to downsize the federal government.
Brilliant fall colors highlight this aerial view of Lake Kabetogama, one of four large lakes that make up Voyageurs National Park. Photo courtesy of Voyageurs National Park via MPR News
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 28(source)
That press conference was choreographed for an audience of one and he sits in Moscow. Once, we fought tyrants. Today Trump and Vance are bending America’s knee. And that weakens us.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 28(source)
Call out to all the Republicans who have posed for photo ops with Zelensky: Is today the day to finally speak out? Patriotism demands it.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 28(source)
Musk and DOGE are putting people’s lives and safety at risk — where are the Republicans ready to stand up and protect your constituents?
@EthanClarkWX: NWS has fired meteorologists as a direct result of upper-level heads telling them to do so. Let me be clear, people will die because of this. Absolutely insane.. I have no words for it. I’ve spent all day I mean all day in meetings with both republicans and democrats fighting.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govFeb 27(source)
The next time you hear Republicans mention tax cuts, ask yourself: For who? Because unless you’re in the top 5%, it’s probably not you.
Graph titled: trumps tax proposals cut taxes for the richest 5% while raising taxes for other groups.
← Newer postsPosts page 53Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
785 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-05-06S.J. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47)
2025-05-06—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-05-06S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-06H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (55-45)
2025-05-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43)
2025-05-01—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-05-01S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-46)
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-45)
2025-04-30S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40)
2025-04-30S.J. Res. 49 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-04-30S.J. Res. 49 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49)
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-46)
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-04-29—Confirm nomineeNOYES✕Nomination Confirmed (83-14)
2025-04-29—End debateNOYES✕Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13)
2025-04-29—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (60-36)
2025-04-29—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36)
2025-04-29—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-39)
2025-04-29—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39)
2025-04-29—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (67-29)
2025-04-28—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27)
2025-04-11—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (60-25)
2025-04-11—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25)
2025-04-11—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-26)
2025-04-11—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25)
2025-04-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-46)
2025-04-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-10H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (53-44)
2025-04-09H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42)
2025-04-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-04-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-04-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-04-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (60-37)
2025-04-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-04-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-04-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42)
2025-04-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-04-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-04-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-08—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (66-32)
2025-04-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32)
2025-04-08—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-04-07—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept House changesNONO✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 16Next →