USAID provides prosthetic limbs to soldiers injured in Ukraine. Shutting it down hurts us, our allies, and emboldens Putin and Russia. The Kremlin have already taken to social media to celebrate what Musk has done.
We need to fight this.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota
Tina Smith
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes27%
No69%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
Tina Smith
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Tina's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 44 sponsored · 315 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Massive, untargeted tariffs on allies like Canada make no sense. Canada is Minnesota’s #1 trading partner.
This is nothing but a tax increase on Minnesota families that I plan to fight.
Elon Musk illegally seized the purse strings of the United States. An unelected billionaire may have access to everyone’s social security numbers.
We need answers now. This power grab cannot stand.
They’re trying to throw doctors in jail for prescribing medication abortion.
Reposted byTina Smith
Senator Smith: What’s so horrible about this moment is that dozens of families are trying to be united with the remains of their loved ones because they died.
And what does Trump do? He tries to turn it into a political thing. He is incapable of taking responsibility for anything he has ever done.
Reposted byTina Smith
“That could truly be the unravelling of our democracy if we don’t stand up to it.” @smith.senate.gov
It was great to join @ivehaditpodcast.bsky.social
to talk about what we’re doing in the Senate to keep up the fight against Donald Trump and his billionaire friends.
Reposted byTina Smith
Hassan, through tears: "I am the proud mother of a 36 year old with severe cerebral palsy. And a day does not go by when I don't think about what I did I do when I was pregnant with him... So please do not suggest that anybody in this body doesn't want to know what the cause of autism is"
Powerful
When you really want to catch the train to vote with two of your favorite colleagues… run like a grandma!
Avian flu has killed more than 100 million animals across the country, and the first human death was just reported.
It’s a challenge I’m going to make sure the next HHS Secretary takes seriously.
Reposted byTina Smith
TINA SMITH: Do you think people who take anti-depressants are dangerous?
RFK Jr: *doesn't answer question*
Reposted byTina Smith
Senator Tina Smith goes after RFK Jr. and Donald Trump during RFK Jr's Senate confirmation hearing:
"What is clear to me is that you and President Trump are dangerous to women's access to Mifepristone."
Spot on.
Americans woke up yesterday morning not knowing if they could still get their health insurance through Medicaid, or drop their child off at daycare.
The Trump Admin is trying to walk this back because the American people were clear. This is not what they voted for.
Reposted byTina Smith
Sen. Smith: "I can respect people with different views than mine on [abortion] but it's hard for me to respect people who won't give a straight answer to what they think."
“Do you think people who take anti-depressants are dangerous?"
The answer is no. Another of RFK Jr’s fringe ideas.
The HHS Secretary should be fighting the stigma around mental health not fanning the flames of conspiracy theories.
Thanks. This clarifies nothing.
The American people are looking for some reassurance that the decisions they make about abortion are personal and private.
It’s hard for me to respect people who won’t give me a straight answer.
Medicare and Medicaid aren’t the same thing - I’d think someone who wants to run our country’s health system should know that.
Medicaid payments nationwide weren’t working yesterday. RFK Jr. is proving at this hearing that he doesn’t even understand the basics of the program.
He’s a danger to American’s health.
Mifepristone HAS been studied over and over again and deemed safe and effective — that’s why it’s been approved for over two decades!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18