At a Glance

Seat

U.S. Senator from Virginia

Born

December 15, 1954

Age 71

Phone

(202) 224-2023

Office

703 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Virginia

Mark R. Warner

Mark Robert Warner is an American businessman and politician serving as the senior United States senator from Virginia, a seat he has held since 2009. A member of the Democratic Party, Warner served as the 69th governor of Virginia from 2002 to 2006. He is vice chair of the Senate Democratic Caucus and vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 789

Yes35%

No61%

Present0%

Not Voting5%

Party align90%

Cross-party10%

SoupScore

District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @MarkWarner Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Mark R. Warner

U.S. SenatorDemocratVirginia

SoupScore

Mark R.'s ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 170 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted bySenator Mark Warner

Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govSep 29(source)

Families across the country are staring down a health care cliff. Unless Congressional Republicans join us to renew the health care tax credits, families across America will see premiums increase by 75%. Senate Democrats will keep fighting to lower health care costs.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 29(source)

Republicans’ quest to shut down the government is simple: they would rather unleash this havoc than simply keep health care costs stable for millions.

Reposted bySenator Mark Warner

Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govSep 25(source)

Pregnant women not able to get the maternity care they need. Folks facing skyrocketing premiums. 15 million people kicked off their health care. This is Trump’s health care crisis, and Republicans would rather shut down the government than fix the mess they made.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 29(source)

What will you stop being able to afford if your premiums go up 75%? Groceries, rent, saving for your kids’ education? This is the calculation families across the country are making right now – but it’s completely avoidable if Republicans drop their cruel cuts to health care.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 29(source)

Democrats’ position is simple: lower costs, save rural health care, keep the government open. It shouldn’t be this hard. Let’s just repeal costly cuts to health care and save millions of Americans money.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 29(source)

Why won’t Republicans work with Democrats to protect Americans’ health care?

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 27(source)

A year later, I’m thinking of Southwest Virginia and the continued efforts to recover from the terrible flooding of Helene.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 26(source)

Trump’s supposed to be the greatest dealmaker. Why won’t he even sit down with Democrats?

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 26(source)

By the way: Trump still hasn’t released the Epstein files.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 26(source)

Trump is weaponizing the American justice system by hiring unqualified personal friends to go after his political opponents. This is a dangerous abuse of power.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 26(source)

Republicans have the House, Senate, and White House. They will fully own any shutdown.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 26(source)

A sad, sad day for our justice system. When a staunchly Republican U.S. Attorney couldn’t even find a credible case against James Comey, Trump pushed him out and found someone who would. Trump will stop at nothing to punish his political enemies.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 25(source)

Donald Trump is openly and nakedly trying to weaponize our justice system. In the end, that's going to make us all less safe.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 25(source)

Trump is once again threatening federal workers. This time, it’s because he wants to avoid a conversation about lowering folks’ health care costs. He is unbelievable!

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 25(source)

Grocery prices are rising at the fastest rate in years, btw.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 24(source)

The message Trump’s sending is clear. If you don’t use your job to pursue baseless lawsuits on his political enemies, he will fire you and find someone who will. This is a dangerous weaponization of our justice system against anyone who disagrees with him.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 24(source)

Trump ran on lowering costs. He lied. After 9 months of Republican control: Health care costs are about to skyrocket. Energy bills are up. Grocery prices are rising fast thanks to tariffs.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 24(source)

Let’s be clear what’s going on with the government funding fight. It’s about nothing more than the cost of YOUR health care. It doesn’t matter if your coverage is Medicaid, employer-sponsored, or from the ACA… if Republicans have their way, your costs are going up.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 23(source)

RFK has shown time and time again he’s not up for this job. He’s taking this country backwards and jeopardizing the health of a generation. It’s long past time for him to resign.

Reposted bySenator Mark Warner

Senator Ed Markey@markey.senate.govSep 23(source)

Your Big Ugly Bill imposed the largest cuts to health care in U.S. history, including over $900 billion in Medicaid cuts. Rural hospitals are already shutting down and reducing services as a result. Tell Trump to stop hiding behind Truth Social and sit down with Democrats.

Senate Republicans
@SenateGOP
(https://x.com/SenateGOP)Democrats voted to cut $50B from rural hospitals last week, so we know they don’t actually care about access to health care.

They just want to fight the President, even if they shut down the government in the process.
Quote

Ed Markey
@SenMarkey
·
3h
TACO Tuesday in the Trump White House. Trump refuses to even sit down with Democrats on health care and lowering costs.

← Newer postsPosts page 34Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(38)

S. 4467 (119th)
A bill to amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act with respect to nursing faci…
S. 4476 (119th)
A bill to provide for voluntary disclosure by developers and users of artificial intelligenc…
S. 4302 (119th)
A bill to improve services provided to taxpayers by the Internal Revenue Service.
S. 4233 (119th)
A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to codify the Medicare low-wage index…
S.J. Res. 135 (119th)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, Unite…

Cosponsored Bills(170)

S.J. Res. 192 (119th)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, Unite…
Joined: 2026-05-19
S. 4538 (119th)
A bill to amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to co…
Joined: 2026-05-14
S. 4545 (119th)
A bill to amend the America COMPETES Act to establish certain scientific integrity policies …
Joined: 2026-05-14
S. Res. 737 (119th)
A resolution recognizing National Foster Care Month as an opportunity to raise awareness abo…
Joined: 2026-05-14
S. 4511 (119th)
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income charitable di…
Joined: 2026-05-13

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

789 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05	—	Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (5-94)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-03	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48)
2025-04-03	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-04-03	S.J. Res. 26 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83)
2025-04-03	S.J. Res. 33 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82)
2025-04-03	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-04-03	H.J. Res. 24 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (53-42)
2025-04-02	H.J. Res. 24 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-02	S.J. Res. 37 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (51-48)
2025-04-02	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-04-02	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-01	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-03-31	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2025-03-27	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-03-27	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-03-27	S.J. Res. 18 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (52-48)
2025-03-26	S.J. Res. 18 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-26	H.J. Res. 25 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	NO	✕↔	Joint Resolution Passed (70-28)
2025-03-26	H.J. Res. 25 (119th)	Begin consideration	YES	NO	✕↔	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-26	—	Confirm nominee	NOT_VOTING	NO	—	Nomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-26	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-03-26	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-26	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-26	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-03-25	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-25	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (56-44)
2025-03-25	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44)
2025-03-25	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-03-25	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 16Next →