Message on Senate action sent to the House.
This resolution authorizes the Capitol Grounds to be used for the 26th annual National Peace Officers' Memorial Service and sets basic conditions for that use. It directs the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board to prescribe safety, scheduling, and enforcement rules and allows the event sponsor to erect temporary structures with approval. The sponsor must make the event free and open to the public, avoid interfering with Congress, and assume all expenses and liabilities. It does not create a new federal law but grants permission and conditions for a specific event on Capitol property.
As a concurrent resolution, it was agreed to by both the House and Senate but is not sent to the President and does not by itself create binding law beyond authorizing use of congressional grounds.
This concurrent resolution authorizes the Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary to hold the 26th annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service on the Capitol Grounds, tentatively May 15, 2007.
The event must be free and open to the public, arranged not to interfere with Congress, and held under conditions set by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; the sponsor assumes expenses and liabilities and may erect necessary structures with approval.
Highly likely to be agreed by both chambers given narrow, ceremonial nature and administrative safeguards; note concurrent resolutions do not become statutory law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed administrative resolution that clearly authorizes use of the Capitol Grounds for a specific commemorative event, delegates necessary implementation details to appropriate Capitol authorities, and assigns financial responsibility to the sponsor.
Liberal cautious about FOP sponsorship and policing politics
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal cautious about FOP sponsorship and policing politics
Generally supportive of a public memorial to officers killed in the line of duty, but cautious about the sponsor and political signals.
Likely to welcome the remembrance while noting broader policing and civil‑rights debates and the Fraternal Order of Police's political positions.
Supportive in pragmatic terms: ceremonial event, sponsor pays costs, and Architect and Capitol Police provide oversight.
Focused on ensuring the event won't interfere with congressional business and that logistical responsibilities are clear.
Strongly supportive: a fitting public honoring of fallen peace officers and appropriate use of the Capitol Grounds.
Values the low federal cost and the role of law enforcement in public safety.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Highly likely to be agreed by both chambers given narrow, ceremonial nature and administrative safeguards; note concurrent resolutions do not become statutory law.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal cautious about FOP sponsorship and policing politics
Highly likely to be agreed by both chambers given narrow, ceremonial nature and administrative safeguards; note concurrent resolutions do n…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed administrative resolution that clearly authorizes use of the Capitol Grounds for a specific commemorative event, delegates necessary implementat…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.