Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
This resolution authorizes the use of the Capitol Grounds for two public events: the 45th Annual National Peace Officers' Memorial Service and the National Honor Guard and Pipe Band Exhibition. It names tentative dates, allows setup and takedown periods, and lets the sponsors erect stages and sound equipment with the Architect of the Capitol's approval. The sponsors must pay all expenses and liabilities, and the Capitol Police Board will enforce rules about sales, advertisements, and other restrictions during the events.
Concurrent resolutions must be passed by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not create binding law. This form is commonly used to authorize use of the Capitol Grounds and set event terms and conditions.
Concurrent resolution authorizing the National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary to use the Capitol Grounds for the 45th Annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service and a National Honor Guard and Pipe Band Exhibition.
It sets dates (May 14–17, 2026, with the service on May 15, 2026), requires events be free and non‑interfering with Congressional business, places expense and liability responsibility on sponsors, authorizes temporary staging subject to Architect of the Capitol approval, and directs Capitol Police Board enforcement of Capitol Grounds restrictions.
Text is highly likely to be adopted by both chambers, but as a concurrent resolution it does not become law; adoption probability high, statutory enactment not applicable.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed administrative authorization that clearly permits two specific public events on the Capitol Grounds, provides concrete dates and timelines, assigns responsibilities for approvals and enforcement, and places financial liability on the sponsors.
Progressives emphasize concerns about FOP's political role and optics.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize concerns about FOP's political role and optics.
Likely mixed: supportive of honoring officers who died in the line of duty, but cautious about giving prominent platform to the Fraternal Order of Police because of its political advocacy.
Concern will center on optics, inclusiveness, and whether police accountability issues are obscured.
Practical provisions—sponsor pays costs and Architect oversight—reduce fiscal concerns.
Generally favorable: views this as a routine, ceremonial use of the Capitol Grounds with sensible operational safeguards.
Main attention will be on scheduling, logistics, and ensuring no cost to taxpayers or interference with Congress.
May seek clear operational details from the Architect and Capitol Police.
Strongly supportive: sees the resolution as an appropriate, noncontroversial tribute to law enforcement and their sacrifices.
Emphasizes tradition, respect for fallen officers, and that sponsors pay costs.
Views Capitol use as fitting for a national memorial service.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Text is highly likely to be adopted by both chambers, but as a concurrent resolution it does not become law; adoption probability high, statutory enactment not applicable.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize concerns about FOP's political role and optics.
Text is highly likely to be adopted by both chambers, but as a concurrent resolution it does not become law; adoption probability high, sta…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed administrative authorization that clearly permits two specific public events on the Capitol Grounds, provides concrete dates and timelines, assi…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.