- Local governmentsEnables potential local job creation through development of defense, renewable energy, and scientific facilities.
- Federal agenciesStops continued federal spending on the Yucca Mountain licensing and related legal processes.
- Local governmentsResponds to state and local opposition by removing the site from consideration for waste disposal.
Jobs, Not Waste Act of 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
This bill repeals statutory provisions authorizing Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste repository, directs the Department of Energy to withdraw its construction application, and terminates the Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing proceeding. It bars future consideration of Yucca Mountain as a repository, requires DOE to reclaim the site and mitigate environmental impacts, and directs the OMB Director to deliver a public study within 180 days on economically viable, job-creating alternative uses identified in GAO‑11‑847, including defense, renewable energy, and scientific research.
Whether ending Yucca Mountain helps communities or undermines national waste strategy
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly achieves a substantive statutory change by repealing identified provisions, terminating the NRC licensing proceeding, withdrawing the DOE application, prohibiting future consideration of Yucca Mountain as a repository, and requiring an OMB study on alternative uses.
This bill repeals statutory provisions authorizing Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste repository, directs the Department of Energy to withdraw its construction application, and terminates the Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing proceeding.
It bars future consideration of Yucca Mountain as a repository, requires DOE to reclaim the site and mitigate environmental impacts, and directs the OMB Director to deliver a public study within 180 days on economically viable, job-creating alternative uses identified in GAO‑11‑847, including defense, renewable energy, and scientific research.
Substantive change to national nuclear waste policy is politically sensitive; short bill is clear but faces institutional and stakeholder barriers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly achieves a substantive statutory change by repealing identified provisions, terminating the NRC licensing proceeding, withdrawing the DOE application, prohibiting future consideration of Yucca Mountain as a repository, and requiring an OMB study on alternative uses. It provides named responsible entities and a firm deadline for the study, but lacks fiscal authorizations, detailed reclamation and mitigation standards or timelines, and specific measures to address legal, contractual, and programmatic fallout.
Whether ending Yucca Mountain helps communities or undermines national waste strategy
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenEliminates the planned centralized repository, extending reliance on interim storage at dispersed facilities.
- Federal agenciesCould increase long-term costs for utilities, states, and the federal government managing interim storage.
- Federal agenciesMay create legal and regulatory uncertainty about federal obligations under existing nuclear waste statutes.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Whether ending Yucca Mountain helps communities or undermines national waste strategy
Generally supportive of ending the Yucca Mountain repository due to long-standing local, environmental, and safety concerns.
Favors reclamation and studying job-creating, renewable, and scientific uses, but is concerned about ensuring a safe national plan for spent nuclear fuel and adequate funding for remediation.
Views the bill as a pragmatic response to political deadlock at Yucca Mountain while opening study of economic reuse options.
Cautious: wants clarity on legal, fiscal, and national nuclear waste-management consequences before full support.
Likely skeptical or opposed because the bill abandons a federal repository option and could undermine national nuclear waste policy and utility contracts.
May welcome economic redevelopment, but only with compensation, legal clarity, and continued safe waste management.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantive change to national nuclear waste policy is politically sensitive; short bill is clear but faces institutional and stakeholder barriers.
- Absent cost estimate for reclamation and downstream waste-management effects
- Potential legal challenges from stakeholders or contractors
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Whether ending Yucca Mountain helps communities or undermines national waste strategy
Substantive change to national nuclear waste policy is politically sensitive; short bill is clear but faces institutional and stakeholder b…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly achieves a substantive statutory change by repealing identified provisions, terminating the NRC licensing proceeding, withdrawing the DOE application, prohibi…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.