H.R. 10143 (119th)Bill Overview

Jobs, Not Waste Act of 2026

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Aug 24, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill repeals statutory provisions authorizing Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste repository, directs the Department of Energy to withdraw its construction application, and terminates the Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing proceeding. It bars future consideration of Yucca Mountain as a repository, requires DOE to reclaim the site and mitigate environmental impacts, and directs the OMB Director to deliver a public study within 180 days on economically viable, job-creating alternative uses identified in GAO‑11‑847, including defense, renewable energy, and scientific research.

Why people may split

Whether ending Yucca Mountain helps communities or undermines national waste strategy

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly achieves a substantive statutory change by repealing identified provisions, terminating the NRC licensing proceeding, withdrawing the DOE application, prohibiting future consideration of Yucca Mountain as a repository, and requiring an OMB study on alternative uses.

This bill repeals statutory provisions authorizing Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste repository, directs the Department of Energy to withdraw its construction application, and terminates the Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing proceeding.

It bars future consideration of Yucca Mountain as a repository, requires DOE to reclaim the site and mitigate environmental impacts, and directs the OMB Director to deliver a public study within 180 days on economically viable, job-creating alternative uses identified in GAO‑11‑847, including defense, renewable energy, and scientific research.

Passage35/100

Substantive change to national nuclear waste policy is politically sensitive; short bill is clear but faces institutional and stakeholder barriers.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly achieves a substantive statutory change by repealing identified provisions, terminating the NRC licensing proceeding, withdrawing the DOE application, prohibiting future consideration of Yucca Mountain as a repository, and requiring an OMB study on alternative uses. It provides named responsible entities and a firm deadline for the study, but lacks fiscal authorizations, detailed reclamation and mitigation standards or timelines, and specific measures to address legal, contractual, and programmatic fallout.

Contention58/100

Whether ending Yucca Mountain helps communities or undermines national waste strategy

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsEnables potential local job creation through development of defense, renewable energy, and scientific facilities.
  • Federal agenciesStops continued federal spending on the Yucca Mountain licensing and related legal processes.
  • Local governmentsResponds to state and local opposition by removing the site from consideration for waste disposal.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenEliminates the planned centralized repository, extending reliance on interim storage at dispersed facilities.
  • Federal agenciesCould increase long-term costs for utilities, states, and the federal government managing interim storage.
  • Federal agenciesMay create legal and regulatory uncertainty about federal obligations under existing nuclear waste statutes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Whether ending Yucca Mountain helps communities or undermines national waste strategy
Progressive75%

Generally supportive of ending the Yucca Mountain repository due to long-standing local, environmental, and safety concerns.

Favors reclamation and studying job-creating, renewable, and scientific uses, but is concerned about ensuring a safe national plan for spent nuclear fuel and adequate funding for remediation.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Views the bill as a pragmatic response to political deadlock at Yucca Mountain while opening study of economic reuse options.

Cautious: wants clarity on legal, fiscal, and national nuclear waste-management consequences before full support.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Likely skeptical or opposed because the bill abandons a federal repository option and could undermine national nuclear waste policy and utility contracts.

May welcome economic redevelopment, but only with compensation, legal clarity, and continued safe waste management.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Substantive change to national nuclear waste policy is politically sensitive; short bill is clear but faces institutional and stakeholder barriers.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absent cost estimate for reclamation and downstream waste-management effects
  • Potential legal challenges from stakeholders or contractors
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Whether ending Yucca Mountain helps communities or undermines national waste strategy

Substantive change to national nuclear waste policy is politically sensitive; short bill is clear but faces institutional and stakeholder b…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly achieves a substantive statutory change by repealing identified provisions, terminating the NRC licensing proceeding, withdrawing the DOE application, prohibi…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis