Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
This bill amends Section 302 of the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act to broaden eligibility for certain wastewater infrastructure and trash‑free waters grants by explicitly adding or clarifying entities such as States, municipalities, units of local government, and Indian Tribes as eligible applicants or recipients.
Left emphasizes environmental justice and Tribal inclusion benefits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that precisely inserts additional eligible recipient categories into the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act.
This bill amends Section 302 of the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act to broaden eligibility for certain wastewater infrastructure and trash‑free waters grants by explicitly adding or clarifying entities such as States, municipalities, units of local government, and Indian Tribes as eligible applicants or recipients.
Small, technocratic amendment with limited fiscal impact fits patterns of successful narrow grant‑eligibility bills; procedural and scheduling factors remain key uncertainties.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that precisely inserts additional eligible recipient categories into the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act. The changes are specific and well-integrated into existing law, but the bill omits fiscal acknowledgment, edge-case safeguards, and new accountability measures.
Left emphasizes environmental justice and Tribal inclusion benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes environmental justice and Tribal inclusion benefits
Likely supportive because the change increases access to federal funding for local governments and Tribal nations to address pollution and environmental justice.
Would want assurances that funds prioritize disadvantaged communities and Tribal consultation.
Likely cautiously supportive as a targeted, procedural expansion of grant eligibility that can increase local capacity.
Would want clarity on fiscal impact, program administration, and measurable outcomes.
Skeptical of expanding federal grant beneficiaries without offsets; concerned about increased federal spending, administrative growth, and federal involvement in local affairs.
May accept if no new mandatory spending is created.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Small, technocratic amendment with limited fiscal impact fits patterns of successful narrow grant‑eligibility bills; procedural and scheduling factors remain key uncertainties.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes environmental justice and Tribal inclusion benefits
Small, technocratic amendment with limited fiscal impact fits patterns of successful narrow grant‑eligibility bills; procedural and schedul…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that precisely inserts additional eligible recipient categories into the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act. The changes are specific and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.