Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
This bill adds a new subsection to section 5019 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 that bars three interstate river basin commissions—the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, the Delaware River Basin Commission, and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin—from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing any regulation relating to hydraulic fracturing unless the regulation is issued pursuant to the authority of the State where it would apply. It effectively prevents those commissions from adopting or enforcing fracking rules that are not state-authorized under the relevant compacts.
Progressives emphasize protecting shared water resources and regional oversight
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory restriction on the regulatory authority of three interstate river basin commissions concerning hydraulic fracturing.
This bill adds a new subsection to section 5019 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 that bars three interstate river basin commissions—the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, the Delaware River Basin Commission, and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin—from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing any regulation relating to hydraulic fracturing unless the regulation is issued pursuant to the authority of the State where it would apply.
It effectively prevents those commissions from adopting or enforcing fracking rules that are not state-authorized under the relevant compacts.
Narrow but politically charged deregulatory change; plausible House support but significant Senate and stakeholder resistance reduce chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory restriction on the regulatory authority of three interstate river basin commissions concerning hydraulic fracturing. The amendment is direct and integrates with the cited statutes by using an explicit "notwithstanding" clause, but it lacks explanatory findings, definitional precision, implementation sequencing, fiscal acknowledgement, and accountability provisions.
Progressives emphasize protecting shared water resources and regional oversight
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize protecting shared water resources and regional oversight
Likely to oppose the bill as restricting regional oversight of shared water resources and removing tools to limit fracking impacts.
Views the change as favoring industry and state-level permissiveness over coordinated environmental protections.
Approaches the bill with mixed views: it clarifies regulatory authority and avoids overlapping rules, but raises concerns about inconsistent protections for interstate waters.
Wants tradeoffs addressed through safeguards and review mechanisms.
Likely to support the bill as protecting state sovereignty, property rights, and limiting regional regulatory overreach.
Sees it as preventing unelected interstate bodies from imposing extra rules on fracking.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow but politically charged deregulatory change; plausible House support but significant Senate and stakeholder resistance reduce chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize protecting shared water resources and regional oversight
Narrow but politically charged deregulatory change; plausible House support but significant Senate and stakeholder resistance reduce chance…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory restriction on the regulatory authority of three interstate river basin commissions concerning hydraulic fracturing. The amendment is direct an…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.