H.R. 1431 (119th)Bill Overview

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2407 State Route 71, Suite 1, in Spring Lake, New Jersey, as the "James J. Howard Post Office".

Government Operations and Politics|Congressional tributesGovernment buildings, facilities, and property
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Feb 18, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill designates the United States Postal Service facility at 2407 State Route 71, Suite 1, Spring Lake, New Jersey, as the "James J. Howard Post Office." It also states that all official references to that facility shall use the new name.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes honoring public service; conservatives warn about naming proliferation.

Watch point

Ceremonial single-location naming bills routinely pass the House with little opposition.

This bill designates the United States Postal Service facility at 2407 State Route 71, Suite 1, Spring Lake, New Jersey, as the "James J.

Howard Post Office." It also states that all official references to that facility shall use the new name.

Passage90/100

Very narrow, low-cost, noncontroversial naming bill with straightforward language; historically such measures usually become law.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention10/100

Liberal emphasizes honoring public service; conservatives warn about naming proliferation.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsFederal agencies · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesHonors James J. Howard by permanently associating his name with a federal facility, preserving his public service legac…
  • Local governmentsProvides symbolic local recognition likely to increase community pride and civic identity.
  • Local governmentsMay generate small increases in local visitorship or attention to the site.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncurs minor federal costs for signage, administrative updates, and document changes.
  • Federal agenciesEstablishes precedent increasing future administrative workload for naming federal properties.
  • Local governmentsMay provoke local disagreement or controversy about the honoree's legacy or selection.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes honoring public service; conservatives warn about naming proliferation.
Progressive90%

Likely views the bill as a harmless, respectful recognition of a public servant from the district.

Support stems from valuing commemorations of civic contribution and local history, while noting it has negligible policy impact.

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

Sees the bill as a routine, low-cost local naming measure with bipartisan precedent.

Supports it if local stakeholders back the designation and if there are no unexpected costs or controversies.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Generally views the bill as a small, local commemorative act that is acceptable if low cost.

Some conservatives might question the proliferation of federal naming but most will consider it harmless and locally focused.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Very narrow, low-cost, noncontroversial naming bill with straightforward language; historically such measures usually become law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Any local naming controversy not visible in text
  • Senate floor scheduling or holds by individual senators
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes honoring public service; conservatives warn about naming proliferation.

Very narrow, low-cost, noncontroversial naming bill with straightforward language; historically such measures usually become law.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis