Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
The bill tightens enforcement of the statutory prohibition on interment or memorialization in National Cemetery Administration cemeteries and Arlington National Cemetery for persons who committed Federal or State capital crimes by directing an appropriate Federal official to take reasonable actions, including public-record searches, to confirm eligibility. It amends applicability language in the Alicia Dawn Koehl Respect for National Cemeteries Act (technical clarification).
Due process: liberals emphasize protections; conservatives prioritize enforcement
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly identifies a narrow substantive policy objective and prescribes concrete actions (statutory duty to search records; an explicit disinterment mandate).
The bill tightens enforcement of the statutory prohibition on interment or memorialization in National Cemetery Administration cemeteries and Arlington National Cemetery for persons who committed Federal or State capital crimes by directing an appropriate Federal official to take reasonable actions, including public-record searches, to confirm eligibility.
It amends applicability language in the Alicia Dawn Koehl Respect for National Cemeteries Act (technical clarification).
The bill also directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of George E.
Limited scope and low cost favor enactment; the compelled disinterment of a named person and potential procedural or privacy objections reduce probability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly identifies a narrow substantive policy objective and prescribes concrete actions (statutory duty to search records; an explicit disinterment mandate). The statutory amendments show integration intent but contain fragmented language and leave key implementation elements unspecified.
Due process: liberals emphasize protections; conservatives prioritize enforcement
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Due process: liberals emphasize protections; conservatives prioritize enforcement
Likely cautiously supportive of protecting the sanctity of national cemeteries and enforcing eligibility rules.
Concerned about due process protections, transparency, and fair application, especially for marginalized individuals.
Worries about burdens on families and potential for administrative errors; wants safeguards and appeals procedures.
Generally supportive as a targeted administrative fix to enforce existing law and resolve a specific case.
Wants clarity on implementation costs, timelines, and safeguards to avoid mistaken disinterments.
Favors limited, transparent procedures and limited federal expense.
Strongly supportive; favors strict enforcement to bar capital criminals from national cemeteries.
Views disinterment order as appropriate correction of an improper honor.
Sees added record-search duty as sensible government oversight rather than overreach.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Limited scope and low cost favor enactment; the compelled disinterment of a named person and potential procedural or privacy objections reduce probability.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Due process: liberals emphasize protections; conservatives prioritize enforcement
Limited scope and low cost favor enactment; the compelled disinterment of a named person and potential procedural or privacy objections red…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly identifies a narrow substantive policy objective and prescribes concrete actions (statutory duty to search records; an explicit disinterment mandate). The sta…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.