Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill amends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit issuance of leases or any authorizations for exploration, development, or production of oil, natural gas, or other minerals in four specified offshore planning areas. The affected areas are the North Atlantic, Mid‑Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida, as depicted in the BOEM 2024–2029 National OCS Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program.
Climate and coastal protection versus domestic energy production priorities.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly targeted statutory amendment that imposes a permanent prohibition on issuing new oil, gas, or mineral leases/authorizations in four identified Outer Continental Shelf planning areas.
This bill amends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit issuance of leases or any authorizations for exploration, development, or production of oil, natural gas, or other minerals in four specified offshore planning areas.
The affected areas are the North Atlantic, Mid‑Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida, as depicted in the BOEM 2024–2029 National OCS Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program.
The prohibition is explicit and applies notwithstanding any other provision of law.
Clear, short ban has localized political appeal but significant fiscal/energy opposition and no built-in compromises reduce likelihood of enactment.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly targeted statutory amendment that imposes a permanent prohibition on issuing new oil, gas, or mineral leases/authorizations in four identified Outer Continental Shelf planning areas. It integrates cleanly into the cited provision of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act and is operationally simple: it creates an unqualified bar on issuance of authorizations.
Climate and coastal protection versus domestic energy production priorities.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Climate and coastal protection versus domestic energy production priorities.
Likely strongly supportive because the bill permanently protects large stretches of East Coast waters from offshore drilling.
It aligns with climate goals, coastal ecosystem protection, and defense of tourism and fishing economies.
Cautiously favorable but pragmatic.
Appreciates coastal protections and tourism preservation but worries about energy security, jobs, and unintended economic impacts without transition plans.
Likely strongly opposed.
Views the provision as an overbroad federal restriction on energy development, harming domestic energy production and local economic opportunities.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Clear, short ban has localized political appeal but significant fiscal/energy opposition and no built-in compromises reduce likelihood of enactment.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Climate and coastal protection versus domestic energy production priorities.
Clear, short ban has localized political appeal but significant fiscal/energy opposition and no built-in compromises reduce likelihood of e…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly targeted statutory amendment that imposes a permanent prohibition on issuing new oil, gas, or mineral leases/authorizations in four identified Ou…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.