H.R. 3158 (119th)Bill Overview

Help Hoover Dam Act

Water Resources Development|Water Resources Development
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
May 1, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Boulder Canyon Project Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to expend monies in the Colorado River Dam fund, including amounts in account XXXR5656P1 recovered on a non‑reimbursable basis. Authorized uses include operations, maintenance, investigation and cleanup actions, and capital improvements at Hoover Dam and on land used for its construction and operation.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes environmental cleanup and jobs benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that creates a specific funding authority for the Secretary of the Interior to use amounts in the Colorado River Dam fund (including a named account) for activities at Hoover Dam, and it situates that authority within existing statutory references.

This bill amends the Boulder Canyon Project Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to expend monies in the Colorado River Dam fund, including amounts in account XXXR5656P1 recovered on a non‑reimbursable basis.

Authorized uses include operations, maintenance, investigation and cleanup actions, and capital improvements at Hoover Dam and on land used for its construction and operation.

The statute requires consultation with Boulder Canyon Project contractors identified in the Hoover Power Allocation Act of 2011.

Passage40/100

Content is narrow and technical with modest fiscal implications, so substance favors passage; procedural timing, absence of cost estimate, and potential stakeholder objections lower certainty.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that creates a specific funding authority for the Secretary of the Interior to use amounts in the Colorado River Dam fund (including a named account) for activities at Hoover Dam, and it situates that authority within existing statutory references.

Contention55/100

Left emphasizes environmental cleanup and jobs benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Permitting process · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Permitting processPermits faster funding for operations, maintenance, and repairs at Hoover Dam.
  • Potential benefitEnables capital improvements and cleanup projects that could extend infrastructure lifespan.
  • Local governmentsLikely supports local construction and maintenance employment during project implementation.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCould reduce external oversight and congressional control over how the fund is spent.
  • Potential burdenMay divert fund resources from other regional water or reclamation priorities.
  • Federal agenciesUse of non‑reimbursable recovered funds may complicate federal budget and accounting transparency.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes environmental cleanup and jobs benefits
Progressive85%

Likely broadly supportive because the amendment enables funding for maintenance, cleanup, and capital improvements at Hoover Dam.

Views consultation and cleanup authority as helpful for protecting environment, public safety, and jobs, while noting oversight should ensure equitable outcomes.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Cautiously favorable: the bill clarifies allowable uses of a specific fund to maintain critical infrastructure.

Wants fiscal safeguards, clear definitions, and reporting to avoid unintended budgetary or legal consequences.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Skeptical overall: may accept targeted infrastructure spending but wary of expanding executive discretion and non‑reimbursable use of recovered funds.

Concerned about federal overreach and lack of explicit fiscal restraints.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Content is narrow and technical with modest fiscal implications, so substance favors passage; procedural timing, absence of cost estimate, and potential stakeholder objections lower certainty.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Size of available fund balances not specified
  • Whether expenditures require separate appropriation actions
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes environmental cleanup and jobs benefits

Content is narrow and technical with modest fiscal implications, so substance favors passage; procedural timing, absence of cost estimate,…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that creates a specific funding authority for the Secretary of the Interior to use amounts in the Colorado River Dam fund (including…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis