Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
The bill prohibits certain federal transportation formula and discretionary grants from being used to procure, operate, or maintain streetcars. It adds explicit prohibitions to 23 U.S.C. 133 and 149(c), and 49 U.S.C. 5307 and 5309.
Progressives emphasize climate, equity, and local transit expansion impacts.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill imposes a clear statutory prohibition on use of specific federal transportation grant funds for streetcars by directly amending relevant provisions of Titles 23 and 49.
The bill prohibits certain federal transportation formula and discretionary grants from being used to procure, operate, or maintain streetcars.
It adds explicit prohibitions to 23 U.S.C. 133 and 149(c), and 49 U.S.C. 5307 and 5309.
The ban applies to surface transportation block grants, CMAQ funds, urbanized area formula grants, and fixed guideway capital investment grants.
Content is narrow and implementable but politically polarizing for urban constituencies; Senate barriers and lack of compromise features lower overall chance.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill imposes a clear statutory prohibition on use of specific federal transportation grant funds for streetcars by directly amending relevant provisions of Titles 23 and 49. The chosen legal vehicle is appropriate for a categorical funding ban, but the bill is under-specified in several implementation-critical respects.
Progressives emphasize climate, equity, and local transit expansion impacts.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize climate, equity, and local transit expansion impacts.
Likely opposed.
The persona views streetcars as one tool for urban transit, equity, and climate goals, and sees a federal funding ban as a harmful constraint on local transit choices.
They worry the bill removes federal support for low-carbon, transit-oriented development.
Mixed-to-skeptical.
The persona sees legitimate concerns about some streetcar projects' costs and federal oversight, but also values local planning flexibility and evidence-based evaluation.
They want guardrails rather than blanket bans.
Likely supportive.
The persona favors limiting federal spending and preventing perceived wasteful subsidies to municipal streetcar projects.
They view the ban as preserving taxpayer money and respecting limited federal scope.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and implementable but politically polarizing for urban constituencies; Senate barriers and lack of compromise features lower overall chance.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize climate, equity, and local transit expansion impacts.
Content is narrow and implementable but politically polarizing for urban constituencies; Senate barriers and lack of compromise features lo…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill imposes a clear statutory prohibition on use of specific federal transportation grant funds for streetcars by directly amending relevant provisions of Titles 23 and 4…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.