Received in the Senate.
A comprehensive National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 that (1) authorizes DoD and related Department of Energy funding and program authorities, (2) expands and streamlines acquisition and procurement authorities, (3) directs numerous programmatic, personnel, health, industrial base, supply-chain, and cybersecurity policies, and (4) includes standalone provisions such as prohibitions on central bank digital currency and multi-year Coast Guard appropriations.
Annual NDAA bills typically advance, but scope, controversial policy riders, and required appropriations increase negotiation risk and likelihood of amendment or removal.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a comprehensive substantive authorization statute (FY2026 NDAA) that also contains substantial administrative and reporting elements. It specifies numerous concrete authorities, integrates with existing law through explicit amendments and references, and builds extensive reporting and oversight mechanisms into many of its provisions.
DEI and education-related prohibitions: liberals oppose, conservatives support.
DEI and education-related prohibitions: liberals oppose, conservatives support.
Mixed overall: supports investments in readiness, environmental cleanup, family supports, and research funding.
Opposes or worries about provisions that restrict civil-rights-related policies, health access, and international research collaboration.
Generally favorable toward improved acquisition efficiency, industrial-base strengthening, and readiness funding, but cautious about cost control, implementation details, and some social-policy riders.
Largely supportive: emphasizes strong investments in shipbuilding, submarines, industrial-base resilience, supply-chain security, and cultural/administrative limits on DEI and certain medical services.
Views CBDC ban favorably.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Annual NDAA bills typically advance, but scope, controversial policy riders, and required appropriations increase negotiation risk and likelihood of amendment or removal.
On Passage
On Motion to Recommit
On Agreeing to the Amendment
DEI and education-related prohibitions: liberals oppose, conservatives support.
Annual NDAA bills typically advance, but scope, controversial policy riders, and required appropriations increase negotiation risk and like…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a comprehensive substantive authorization statute (FY2026 NDAA) that also contains substantial administrative and reporting elements. It specifies numero…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.