Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Directs the Secretary of the Interior (through the USGS Director) to establish a competitive grant program to monitor wildfires by satellite. Grants (at least three) fund public–private purchase and integration of high‑resolution multi‑ and hyper‑spectral imaging (visible, NIR, SWIR, thermal IR, radar) and use of those data to detect, assess, respond to and manage wildfires, including active fire behavior, prescribed fire safety, and post‑fire risk/recovery.
Open-data vs private vendor control of satellite-derived information
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a new grant authority and provides a focused appropriation to support satellite-based wildfire monitoring, designating the Secretary (through USGS) as implementer and establishing minimum program elements and a reporting requirement.
Directs the Secretary of the Interior (through the USGS Director) to establish a competitive grant program to monitor wildfires by satellite.
Grants (at least three) fund public–private purchase and integration of high‑resolution multi‑ and hyper‑spectral imaging (visible, NIR, SWIR, thermal IR, radar) and use of those data to detect, assess, respond to and manage wildfires, including active fire behavior, prescribed fire safety, and post‑fire risk/recovery.
Requires an application process, a Congressional report within two fiscal years, and authorizes $20 million per year for FY2026–2028.
Small, technical, disaster-resilience grant programs customarily attract bipartisan backing and are often enacted or folded into larger packages.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a new grant authority and provides a focused appropriation to support satellite-based wildfire monitoring, designating the Secretary (through USGS) as implementer and establishing minimum program elements and a reporting requirement. The bill is adequate to launch a program but relies heavily on agency implementation decisions for most substantive operational details.
Open-data vs private vendor control of satellite-derived information
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Open-data vs private vendor control of satellite-derived information
Generally favorable: federal investment in monitoring wildfire risk aligns with climate resilience and public safety priorities.
Likely to support the science‑based data focus but concerned the program is short‑term and may over-rely on private vendors or exclude tribal/local stakeholders.
Generally supportive but pragmatic: applauds targeted investment in technological monitoring and USGS oversight while wanting clearer metrics, accountability, and sustainable funding.
Views the bill as a sensible incremental resilience measure.
Cautiously open to the bill because it supports state-level wildfire response and uses technology, but wary of creating new federal grant programs and potential federal overreach.
Support hinges on limited spending and state control.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Small, technical, disaster-resilience grant programs customarily attract bipartisan backing and are often enacted or folded into larger packages.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Open-data vs private vendor control of satellite-derived information
Small, technical, disaster-resilience grant programs customarily attract bipartisan backing and are often enacted or folded into larger pac…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a new grant authority and provides a focused appropriation to support satellite-based wildfire monitoring, designating the Secretary (through USGS) as…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.