Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 232.
The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to establish a Post-Disaster Reforestation and Restoration Program. The Secretary, coordinating with covered agencies, must annually identify federal and Indian forest lands needing active reforestation after unplanned disturbances, propose priority projects, and may carry out projects via grants, contracts (including ISDEAA contracts), and cooperative agreements.
Left emphasizes climate/ecosystem restoration and tribal inclusion benefits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear administrative programmatic framework (identification, priority projects, allowable implementation vehicles, outreach, and recurring reporting) and integrates with existing statutory definitions, but it omits several operational and fiscal details that would be expected for full implementation readiness.
The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to establish a Post-Disaster Reforestation and Restoration Program.
The Secretary, coordinating with covered agencies, must annually identify federal and Indian forest lands needing active reforestation after unplanned disturbances, propose priority projects, and may carry out projects via grants, contracts (including ISDEAA contracts), and cooperative agreements.
The program must support seed and seedling availability, conduct outreach to tribes, states, localities, and other stakeholders, and deliver biennial then annual reports to Congress on needs, projects, and gaps.
Program is narrow and non-ideological so administratively plausible, but lacks funding language and must compete for appropriations or be attached to larger must-pass legislation.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear administrative programmatic framework (identification, priority projects, allowable implementation vehicles, outreach, and recurring reporting) and integrates with existing statutory definitions, but it omits several operational and fiscal details that would be expected for full implementation readiness.
Left emphasizes climate/ecosystem restoration and tribal inclusion benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes climate/ecosystem restoration and tribal inclusion benefits
Likely broadly supportive, viewing the bill as a proactive federal response to ecological damage and climate-exacerbated disturbance.
Praises tribal inclusion, seedling support, and emphasis on restoring ecosystems and equity in outreach.
May want stronger, explicit funding authorizations, emphasis on native species, and worker protections.
Generally favorable if the program is well-scoped and fiscally responsible.
Appreciates coordination across agencies and annual reporting to Congress, but seeks clarity on funding, overlap with existing programs, and measurable outcomes.
Will weigh cost controls and efficient grant administration.
Skeptical, focused on potential federal overreach, new spending, and regulatory expansion.
Concerned about unclear funding, increased administrative costs, and possible restrictions on traditional land uses.
May support limited restoration but prefers state, local, or private-led responses.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Program is narrow and non-ideological so administratively plausible, but lacks funding language and must compete for appropriations or be attached to larger must-pass legislation.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes climate/ecosystem restoration and tribal inclusion benefits
Program is narrow and non-ideological so administratively plausible, but lacks funding language and must compete for appropriations or be a…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear administrative programmatic framework (identification, priority projects, allowable implementation vehicles, outreach, and recurring reporting) an…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.