H. Res. 1045 (119th)Bill Overview

Calling on the Secretary of Education to work with stakeholders to immediately eliminate race-based Native logos, mascots, and names from State educational institutions…

Sports and Recreation|Sports and Recreation
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 9, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution urges the Secretary of Education to work with Tribal Nations, Native groups, schools, and stakeholders to eliminate race‑based Native logos, mascots, and names from State educational institutions, especially those receiving federal funds.

It also calls on State educational institutions and national sports franchises to stop unsanctioned use of such logos, mascots, and names and condemns racism and discrimination.

Passage5/100

Non-binding House resolution with no legal hook; can be adopted by the House but cannot itself create binding law.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a non-binding expression of the House's position: it communicates a clear problem and national preference and urges federal and nonfederal actors to act, but it provides minimal operational detail, lacks definitions, funding or legal hooks, and contains no accountability or measurement provisions.

Contention70/100

Progressives emphasize harms to Native youth and federal trust duties

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Students · WorkersLocal governments
Likely helped
  • StudentsMay reduce stereotyping and improve Native students’ self-esteem and academic performance.
  • WorkersMay strengthen collaboration with Tribes and respect for their cultural sovereignty.
  • StudentsCould foster more inclusive school climates for all students.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersWill impose financial costs for rebranding, uniforms, signage, and merchandising.
  • Local governmentsMay be perceived as federal overreach into state and local education choices.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould increase administrative workload for districts and education agencies.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize harms to Native youth and federal trust duties
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive.

The resolution aligns with protecting civil rights, reducing racial stereotyping, and honoring the federal trust responsibility to Native Nations.

It is seen as an appropriate federal role to coordinate with Tribes and end harmful imagery in schools.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally favorable but cautious.

The resolution's goals are credible and supported by research, but centrists will want clear guidance, respect for local control, and funding or practical timelines to ease transitions.

They view it as appropriate for the Secretary to convene stakeholders rather than impose mandates.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely skeptical or opposed.

Even as a nonbinding resolution, it raises concerns about federal pressure on local schools, erosion of traditions, and federal overreach.

Conservatives will emphasize local control, parental rights, and fiscal prudence.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

Non-binding House resolution with no legal hook; can be adopted by the House but cannot itself create binding law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule and bring this resolution to a floor vote
  • Potential organized opposition from local communities or state legislatures
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize harms to Native youth and federal trust duties

Non-binding House resolution with no legal hook; can be adopted by the House but cannot itself create binding law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a non-binding expression of the House's position: it communicates a clear problem and national preference and urges federal and nonfederal acto…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis