H. Res. 1116 (119th)Bill Overview

Commemorating the 5-year remembrance of the March 16, 2021, shootings in the Atlanta, Georgia, region and denouncing continuing anti-Asian hate…

Crime and Law Enforcement|Crime and Law Enforcement
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 16, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

House Resolution commemorating the fifth anniversary of the March 16, 2021 Atlanta spa shootings, condemning anti-Asian hate and xenophobic/anti-immigrant rhetoric, and calling for improved hate-crime reporting, expanded DOJ community programs, online-hate countermeasures, AANHPI education, and culturally responsive supports.

Passage2/100

As a House simple resolution it does not create binding law; passage in both chambers would not create statute without further action.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions predominantly as a commemorative resolution: it clearly states the problem, memorializes victims, and condemns anti-Asian hate while situating the issue within broader social and historical context. It also includes nonbinding policy exhortations, but those exhortations lack concrete mechanisms, funding acknowledgment, implementation pathways, and accountability measures.

Contention60/100

Liberals prioritize immediate funding and concrete implementation actions

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agencies · CommunitiesFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal attention and moral condemnation of anti-Asian hate, potentially improving public awareness.
  • CommunitiesEncourages restoration and expansion of DOJ and community hate-crime programs, possibly leading to more funding and job…
  • Targeted stakeholdersCalls for improved hate-crime reporting infrastructure, which could raise reporting rates and data quality.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersThe resolution is non-binding and contains no appropriations, so it may produce limited concrete policy change.
  • Federal agenciesCalls to expand federal programs could increase administrative costs if new funding and staffing are required.
  • Federal agenciesEncouraging federal involvement in education may raise federal-versus-state curriculum authority tensions and disputes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals prioritize immediate funding and concrete implementation actions
Progressive90%

Likely to view the resolution positively as a necessary recognition of targeted violence and systemic anti-Asian bias.

Sees the calls to expand DOJ programs, improve reporting, fund culturally responsive mental-health services, and strengthen education as important steps.

Will note the symbolic value but press for concrete funding and implementation.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Likely to support the resolution's memorial and condemnation of hate while treating it as largely symbolic.

Would welcome improved reporting infrastructure and community services but seek clarity on costs, oversight, and civil-liberties safeguards for online-hate initiatives.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Likely to agree with condemning violence and honoring victims but wary of calls to expand federal DOJ programs and online-hate measures.

May view some language as politicized or as risking federal overreach and free-speech tensions.

Might press for state/local roles and oversight before supporting program expansions.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood2/100

As a House simple resolution it does not create binding law; passage in both chambers would not create statute without further action.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule floor consideration or leave it in committee
  • Potential targeted opposition on language about DOJ program expansion
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals prioritize immediate funding and concrete implementation actions

As a House simple resolution it does not create binding law; passage in both chambers would not create statute without further action.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions predominantly as a commemorative resolution: it clearly states the problem, memorializes victims, and condemns anti-Asian hate while situating the issue wit…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis