H. Res. 23 (119th)Bill Overview

Proxy Voting for New Parents Resolution

Simple ResolutionCongress|CommutingCongress
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Jan 9, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution changes the House rules to let a Member who has given birth or whose spouse has given birth name another Member to vote or record their presence for a limited time. The proxy authorization generally lasts 12 weeks from the birth (with a pre-birth option for medical reasons) and sets out how to submit, alter, and revoke the designation, what the Clerk must do, and how proxy votes or presences are recorded. It also allows similar proxy designations for committee votes and explains that Members whose votes are cast by proxy are not counted for quorum purposes. Because it is a House simple resolution, it only changes House practice and does not create binding law outside the chamber.

Passage rules

As a simple House resolution, it would be adopted only by the House and is not sent to the President; it changes internal House rules and procedures but does not become law outside the chamber. Adoption follows the House's normal procedures and majority vote rules for such resolutions.

This House resolution authorizes Members who give birth or whose spouse gives birth to designate another Member as a proxy to cast votes and record presence for up to 12 weeks.

Members may pre-designate if a health care provider certifies a serious pregnancy medical condition; designations require signed letters to the Clerk or committee leaders.

The Clerk must verify, notify leaders, and publish active designations; proxies must cast votes by ballot card marked "by proxy" and follow exact instructions from the absent Member.

Passage5/100

As a House internal resolution it does not become federal law; it could be adopted as a House rule by majority but has negligible chance to 'become law' via Congress.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative rule change that clearly defines who is eligible, the duration of the authority, the form and content of designations, and the responsibilities of House officers and committees. It integrates with existing House rules and includes practical safeguards such as revocation on casting a personal vote and exclusion of proxies from quorum counts.

Contention65/100

Progressives emphasize parental accommodation and equity benefits.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitAllows new parents to participate in floor and committee votes without immediate travel.
  • Potential benefitFacilitates parental recovery and reduces health-related travel burdens after childbirth.
  • Potential benefitHelps maintain constituent representation during a legislator's short-term parental leave.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay reduce in-person accountability and direct participation in House deliberations.
  • Potential burdenCreates potential for coercion, miscommunication, or disputes over the "exact instruction" requirement.
  • Potential burdenAdds administrative burden on the Clerk and committee offices to verify and publish proxy designations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize parental accommodation and equity benefits.
Progressive90%

Overall supportive.

This policy reduces barriers for new parents serving in Congress and advances family‑friendly workplace norms.

It provides a defined, time‑limited accommodation and includes verification and public reporting steps.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Cautiously supportive.

The resolution reasonably balances accommodation for new parents with time limits and verification requirements.

However, there are procedural and accountability details that merit clarification to avoid unintended precedents.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Skeptical or opposed.

While sympathetic to accommodating new parents, this expands remote and proxy voting—changing in‑person representation norms and raising accountability concerns.

The narrow scope lessens but does not eliminate precedent worries.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

As a House internal resolution it does not become federal law; it could be adopted as a House rule by majority but has negligible chance to 'become law' via Congress.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Potential partisan objections to proxy voting norms
  • Practical enforcement of 'exact instruction' requirement
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize parental accommodation and equity benefits.

As a House internal resolution it does not become federal law; it could be adopted as a House rule by majority but has negligible chance to…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative rule change that clearly defines who is eligible, the duration of the authority, the form and content of designations, and the resp…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis