Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
This bill amends Section 17 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (the CACFP) to add an additional reimbursement for each meal and supplement.
Liberals emphasize child nutrition and provider support benefits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted statutory amendment that clearly specifies an additional per-meal reimbursement and integrates that increase into existing CACFP statutory provisions, with an explicit effective date.
This bill amends Section 17 of the Richard B.
Russell National School Lunch Act (the CACFP) to add an additional reimbursement for each meal and supplement.
Beginning the first month after enactment, each meal and supplement served under the section receives a $0.10 extra reimbursement, with future adjustment per section 11(a).
Modest, popular-seeming increase to a child nutrition program improves passage odds, but new recurring spending without offsets reduces standalone chances unless attached to larger legislation.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted statutory amendment that clearly specifies an additional per-meal reimbursement and integrates that increase into existing CACFP statutory provisions, with an explicit effective date.
Liberals emphasize child nutrition and provider support benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize child nutrition and provider support benefits
Likely to view the bill positively as a targeted boost to child nutrition funding that helps child-care providers cover meal costs.
Will note the adjustment clause as important but may see the amount as modest compared with needs.
Seen as a modest, pragmatic improvement to an existing child nutrition program that addresses costs for providers.
Supportive if the fiscal impact is reasonable and transparent, and if administrative burdens remain small.
Likely skeptical about expanding federal reimbursement rates and ongoing entitlement costs; may accept the small increase if offset or time-limited, but generally prefers state/local solutions and fiscal restraint.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest, popular-seeming increase to a child nutrition program improves passage odds, but new recurring spending without offsets reduces standalone chances unless attached to larger legislation.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize child nutrition and provider support benefits
Modest, popular-seeming increase to a child nutrition program improves passage odds, but new recurring spending without offsets reduces sta…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted statutory amendment that clearly specifies an additional per-meal reimbursement and integrates that increase into existing CACFP statutory provisions, w…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.